. |
Besides
aspiration (described in the previous chapter), surgical
intervention is needed very rarely. Only in the event of
complications, open drainage and other surgical
procedures may be indicated.
1.
Open drainage
Enthusiastic use of surgical incision and drainage of
amoebic liver abscess at the turn of the century
accounted for the then high mortality rate. Surgeon
Valdesstaunch exponent of 1 was a this method.
Similarly Schapirois a must and that 2 was convinced that early
open drainage there are no additional hazards if
necessary precautions are taken.
With the development of powerful amoebicides, open
drainage fell into disrepute. In 1923, Manson-Bahr
strongly condemned this procedure with its risks of
secondary infection resulting in sinuses, peritonitis and
other unpleasant sequelae.
However, the alarmingly high mortality of the past has
recently come down dramatically, probably due to the
availability of modern drugs, anaesthesia and surgical
procedures. Table I shows fall in mortality rate from 14%
in the late sixties to 8% in the early seventies.3
TABLE
- I
| Fall in mortality rate
(Bautista et al3) |
| Year |
No of patients |
Open drainage |
Mortality |
| 1963-70 |
1,333 |
200(15%) |
18(14%) |
| 1971-74 |
665 |
46(7%) |
4(8.7%) |
The
total number of patients requiring surgery has been
decreasing as most of them are treated successfully by
conservative therapy.
Indications
Today, the most important indication for open
drainage of an amoebic liver abscess is secondary
infection, which fails to respond to appropriate
antibiotics in addition to amoebicidal therapy and
aspiration.
A left lobe abscess may also be an indication for open
drainage. If after 24-48 hours of medical treatment there
is no response, laparotomy may be performed. The abscess
is aspirated. It should then be entered and dependent
penrose drain established.4 (Currently, in centres with
scanning facilities, most of these patients are being
aspirated percutaneously with success.)
Presence of more than one abscess is considered by some
authors to be an indication. We have had to resort to it
rarely and only when tapping did not yield enough pus.
Surgical drainage as discussed elsewhere has to be
undertaken in cases of rupture with peritonitis.
In the present era of specific amoebicides, previous
indications like failure to evacuate pus by aspiration,
necessity for repeated aspirations and minimal clinical
improvement5 no longer warrant surgical
intervention. However, after three to four aspirations if
the quantity of pus which can be removed does not
decrease, open drainage is indicated.
Procedure
The patient is prepared as in any other abdominal
operation.
Anaesthesia
General anaesthesia is induced by a small dose
(not more than 200 mgm.) of 1. V. Pentothal. Injection of
scoline is given 1. V. in a dose of not more than 50 to
75 mgm. Hypoxia must be avoided by using controlled
respiration. The patient is hyperventilated with a
mixture of 50% oxygen and 50% nitrous oxide. For
maintaining relaxation, Flaxedil should be used. The use
of Tubarine and Halothane should be avoided as far as
possible. In patients having multiple liver abscesses,
jaundice or abnormal liver function tests, Scoline should
be avoided. In toxic patients (and many cases coming to
surgery are toxic) epidural block is the anaesthesia of
choice.
The principles of
the operation are:
- To avoid
contamination of pleural or peritoneal cavities
best accomplished by anterior extraperitoneal or
posterior retroperitoneal routes,
- to evacuate
the contents quickly and completely and to
establish a drain,
- to send the
material for culture and sensitivity tests and
institute specific antibiotic therapy.
The anterior
approach is best suited for abscesses in the inferior,
antero-lateral and superior aspects of the liver. A
subcostal transverse incision is made and deepened upto
the peritoneum which is then separated with a finger till
the abscess is palpated. This is now opened by plunging
the finger through the wall and the pus is carefully
evacuated. One end of a large soft rubber tube is
introduced into the abscess cavity while the other is
brought out through a separate stab incision situated
slightly below the initial incision.6-8 The incision is sutured and
a firm dressing applied.
The posterior approach is preferred in abscesses situated
posteriorly. The incision is made over the twelfth rib
which is resected subperiostealy. A transverse incision
through the bed of this rib at the level of the first
lumbar vertebra avoids accidental entry into the pleura.
On reaching the peritoneum it is separated with a finger
in the retroperitoneal space until the abscess is felt.
The pus is evacuated and a drain established as described
earlier.
The after care is the same as described in the previous
chapter and special attention is paid to the care of the
drainage tube and specific antibiotic therapy. When the
drainage from the catheter gradually diminishes, a
process requiring two to three weeks on an average, the
drain is gradually shortened.3 It is preferable to do a
contrast "cavitogram" X-ray to ensure that the
cavity is obliterated from below up, before the drain is
finally removed.
The most important complication of open drainage is
secondary infection, the onset of which is heralded by
increasing pain, rising fever, leucocytosis and a change
in the character of the drainage fluid. It has been
discussed in detail earlier. After culture and
sensitivity tests, the specific antibiotics should
immediately be started. Most other complications are
those following any abdominal operation and are best
dealt with in any text book of surgery. Others like skin
amoebiasis have already been discussed.
2.
Hepatic Resection
Balasegaram9 carried out hepatic resection in
seven of his cases. He also did saucerization with
debridement of liver tissue in some cases.
With the availability of modern amoebicidal drugs and
antibiotics, hepatic resection would be considered
obsolete by many authorities.
3.
Surgical Treatment of
Complications
Pericardial involvement requires immediate and
repeated aspirations. Sometimes drainage may be
necessary.10 The subject has also been
dealt with in chapter on Amoebic pericarditis.
Laparotomy with meticulous peritoneal toilet may be
necessary in cases of peritonitis following a rupture of
the abscess.
Amoebic cerebral abscess is a fatal complication. It
appears to be unresponsive to amoebicidal drugs and is
best treated by early aspiration.11
Abscesses of the liver which rupture spontaneously into
the stomach or intestine generally heal rapidly if the
patient survives the initial shock because the position
of the opening is favourable for cicatrization. Usually
the drainage is adequate and even large abscesses may
heal in three to four weeks.12
The treatment of pleuropulmonary complications is
discussed in the next chapter.
References
- Valdes,
U. Surg. Gyn. Obst. (I.A.S ),1926, 42, 822.
- Schapiro,
M M, Arch. Surg., 1956, 73, 780.
- Bautista
O'Farrill, I, Proc. Internat. Conf. on
Amoebiasis, 1975, Ed. by Sepulveda B. and
Diamond, L S. Instituto Mexicano Del Seguro
Social; Mexico, 1976.
- Bockus,
H L, Gastroenterology, Vol IV, 3rd Edition, W B
Saunders & Co., Philad.. 1976.
- Wilmot,
A J, Clinical Amoebiasis, Blackwell Scientific
Publications, Oxford, 1962.
- Davis
L, Christopher's Textbook of Surgery, 11th
Edition, W B Saunders & Co., Igakussion
Asianed, Tokyo, 1977.
- Schwartz,
S L, Principhs of Surgery, Vol. II, 2nd Edition,
McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1974.
- Ochsner,
A, Maingot's Abdominal Operations, Vol 1. 5th
Edition. Appleton Centurv Crofts. Publishing
Division Prentice Incorporation, New York, 1974,
- Balasegaram,
M, Ann. Surg., 1972,175, 528.
- Lamont,
N M, and Pooler, N R. Quart. J. Med., 1958, 27,
389.
- Huges,
F B. J. Pediatrics, 1975, 86, 95.
- Paul
Milroy, Brit. J. Surg, 1960, 47, 502.
|