FOETO-PLACENTAL WEIGHT RELATIONSHIP IN NORMAL PREGNANCY AND PRE-ECLAMPSIA-ECLAMPSIA - A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Pandit A Palaskar*, Kamlesh R Chaudhary**,Niranjan M Mayadeo***
*Registrar; **Lecturer; ***Asso. Prof., Department of Obst. and Gynaec, KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 12.
The placenta being a foetal organ is small when the foetus is small, but weight is a poor indicator of placental adequacy. However, low placental weight does decrease functional reserve of the placenta.
A comparative study of foeto-placental weight relationship was carried out at our Institute. 100 cases were studied from pre-eclampsia-eclampsia which were compared with 100 normal pregnancies as control group. In normal pregnancies, the mean birth weight was 2790 gms, the mean placental weight was 475 gms., the mean foeto-placental ratio was 5.87:1 and the mean placental coefficient was 0.171. In pre-eclampsia-eclampsia the mean birth weight was reduced to 2368 gms and the mean placental weight reduced to 392 gms. The mean foeto-placental ratio was increased to 6.04 : 1 and the mean placental co-efficient decreased to 0.165.
INTRODUCTION
The placenta - ‘the life of the foetus in utero’ - functions diversely to support the growth of the foetus, interacts with the two individuals, the mother and the developing foetus. It is the most accurate record of the infants prenatal experiences (Benirschke, 1981).
During pregnancy, the placental mass maintains a dynamic relationship with the weight of developing foetus. Being a disorder of the chorionic villi, pre-eclampsia - eclampsia leads to various changes in the placenta with the consequent affection of the foetus.
In the present study, an attempt is made to study the foeto-placental weight relationship in pre-eclampsia - eclampsia, which is compared with normal pregnancies.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This prospective study of 200 cases was carried out in our Institute. 100 cases were from pre-eclampsia - eclampsia group and 100 cases were normal pregnancies as control group.
Patients with clinical diagnosis of pre-eclampsia - eclampsia were included in the study. Patients with gestational age less than 32 weeks were excluded from study. As soon as cases from above groups were admitted in labour room, detailed obstetric and medical history was recorded and clinical examination done. Necessary investigations carried out. After delivery babies weighed. The placentae examined after delivery. Adherent clots removed, placentae washed thoroughly with water, cord cut 4 cm from insertion and placentae weighed. The foeto-placental weight relationship calculated by following formulae.
Statistical significance was analyzed with chi - square test and standard error of proportion between two means.
OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS
TABLE 1
Distribution of birth weight Birth weight Control group (n=100) Pre-eclampsia - eclampsia(gms) (n=100) 1001-1500 0 10 1501-2000 0 15 2001-2500 20 24 2501-3000 64 42 3001-3500 16 09 Total 100 100
As compared to control group, low birth weight babies were common in pre- eclampsia - eclampsia (50%).
TABLE 2
Distribution of placental weightPlacental weight Control group(n=100) Pre-eclampsia-eclampsia(gms) (n=100)251-350 0 25351-450 44 52451-550 56 23551-650 — —Total 100 100
In control group, 56% of placentae weighted 451 to 550 gms, whereas in pre-eclampsia - eclampsia 77% of placentae were less than 450 gms.
The mean placental weight in control group was 475 gms and in pre-eclampsia - eclampsia 392 gms.DISCUSSION
The foeto-placental unit is adversely affected in pre-eclampsia-eclampsia. Due to placental insufficiency foetal growth is affected. According to Little and Thomson et al, for evaluation of foetus, weight of placenta is not enough but the foeto-placental ratio is important.[1,5]
TABLE 3
Foeto-placental ratio and placental co-efficientGroup Mean birth wt (gm) Mean Placental wt (gm) F-P Ratio Placental co-efficientControl Group 2790 475 5.87 0.171Pre-eclampsia –eclampsia 2368 392 6.04 0.165
Fox states that the placenta being a foetal organ is small when the foetus is small and low placental weight does decrease functional reserve of the placenta.[4]
TABLE 4
Comparison with different seriesSeries Year Group FP Ratio Placental Co-efficient A 5.53 0.182Saigalet al 1970 B 6.06 0.165 A 6.56 0.152Daset al 1996 B 5.60 0.178 A 5.87 0.171Present study 2001 B 6.04 0.165
A - Control group, B - pre-eclampsia-eclampsia
Thomson et al observed that, in severe preeclampsia-eclampsia, placental weight and birth weight were both below average, but their ratio was slightly increased.[5] Saigal et al observed F-P ratio 6.06 : 1 and placental coefficient 0.165 in pre-eclampsia-eclampsia.[2] However, Das et al in their analysis of placentae from pre-eclampsia - eclampsia found that the placentae were lighter in weight, lesser in diameter and foeto-placental ratio was diminished.[3]
In present study, the foeto-placental ratio in pre-eclampsia-eclampsia increased to 6.04 : 1 and the placental co-efficient decreased to 0.165, suggesting decreased placental weight in pre-eclampsia - eclampsia, as compared to normal pregnancies.
CONCLUSION
Both the foetal and placental weight is decreased in pre-eclampsia-eclampsia, but the foeto-placental ratio is increased and the placental co-efficient is decreased as a result to placental affection.
REFERENCES :
1.Little William A. Am Jr Obst and Gynecol 1960; 79 : 134-37.
2.Saigal Saroj and Shrivastav JR. Indian Pediatrics 1970; 7 (2) : 68-77.
3.Das B, Dutta D, Chakraborty S, Math P. Jr Obst and Gynecol 1996; 46 (1) : 40-46.
4.Fox HC. Pathology of Placenta : WB Saunders Co. 1978; 58-66.
5.Thomson AM, Billewicz WZ, Hytten FE. Jr Obst and Gynecol Br Commonwealth 1969; 76 (10) : 865-72.
![]() |