Bombay Hospital Journal ContentsHomeArchivesSearchBooksFeedback

ORIGINAL / RESEARCH

CHANGING TRENDS IN CAESAREAN SECTION Would Audit Make An Impact?
Anahita Pandole, Sanjay Rao, Vijay Pawar, Manjiri Jain, Suchita Pandit, VR Badhwar

 
Caesarean section has become a relatively safer procedure in the practice of modern obstetrics. Audit plays an important role in the analysis of changing trends in caesarean delivery.

In the present study carried out at a tertiary care institute it was found that the leading cause of caesarean section followed by foetal distress.

Individualization of every case, meticulous clinical examination, use of intrapartum foeto-maternal surveillance along with regular use of partogram would limit the practice of caesarean section.

Obstetric audits, following standardized guidelines and practice of evidenced-based medicine will help us a lot in reducing the rate of caesarean section.
 
INTRODUCTION
The advent of better anaesthesia, availability. of improvised surgical techniques and prophylactic antibiotics have made caesarean section a relatively safer procedure in the practice of modern obstetrics. The decision whether to perform a caesarean section or not, is based on the individualized judgement of the obstetrician, the hospital where the caesarean would be performed. Economic factors and fear of litigation are other considerations. Which may indirectly influence such decisions. Audit plays an important role in the analysis of changing trends in caesarean delivery rates, the needs and benefits of such changes and to modify the

obstetricians towards the use of caesarean delivery. The present cross-sectional study attempts to critically analyze one hundred cases of caesarean deliveries performed in tertiary hospital over a span of four months.
 
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The LTMG hospital is a tertiary referral institute, which cares for over 6000 deliveries per year. In the present cross sectional study, 100 cases of caesarean delivery were analyzed regarding the indication, morbidity, mortality, anaesthesia complication and the possibility of a repeat caesarean delivery in the next pregnancy. The decision to perform a caesarean section in each of these patients was made by a qualified lecturer on duty in consultation with the unit head telephonically.
 
Observation
The main indications of caesarean delivery are shown in Table 1. Previous LSCS, was the leading cause in 27% of cases. This was followed by foetal distress in 22% of cases, malpresentations (13%), primi with breech (7%) and large estimated birth weight.

Table 3 shows the number and percentage of repeat caesarean deliveries in cases of previous caesarean deliveries. Non progress of labour and CPD accounted for 14.8% and 25.9% cases, respectively. Repeat caesarean section had to be performed for failed induction in 7.4% cases. Three patients had more than one scar on the uterus.

The correlation between APGAR score at 1 min and 5 min as compared to the cardiotocographic results prior to delivery are shown in Table 4.

As shown in Table 5 a cardiotocography was done in 83% of cases and 41% were reactive and 42% were non-reactive.
 
DISCUSSION.
There has been a steady increase in the rate of caesarean section in both developed and developing countries. Although the WHO recommends that there is no justification to increase a caesarean rate in excess of 10 to 15%, it may be difficult to contain the rates in tertiary institutes, catering to a large population of transferred cases.1

Previous caesarean section was the leading indication for a caesarean delivery in the study group. Therefore a careful individualization of every case, meticulous clinical examination and use of intensive intrapartum foetomaternal surveillance could probably reduce the rates of caesarean section.2

Foetal distress was the next leading indication for performance of a caesarean section in the present study series. Foetal distress refers to foetal hypoxia, but often no efforts are taken to document this condition which would be desirable for medicolegal purposes later. Also a significant rise in caesarean section could be attributed to electronic foetal monitoring. A study by Levens et al published in the New England Journal of Medicine confirms, higher caesarean section rates for foetal distress with no significant difference in the perinatal mortality rates in the caesarean versus vaginal route of delivery.3

13% of caesarean section in our series was done for non progress of labour. Failure to progress or non-progress of labour is an ill-defined terminology. Lack of dilatation or descent of the presenting part are often over diagnosed without monitoring the partogram. Thus in every case it would be ideal to monitor the progress of labour according to the graphical representation by partogram, thus decreasing the rates of caesarean section.4 It would be equally important to provide adequate labour analgesia and a constant caring companion whenever possible. Also maintenance of hydration and nutrition is crucial during labour.

For malpresentations like breech or transverse lie it would be worthwhile attempting an external cephalic version at 36 weeks using cardiotocographic monitoring to reduce the need for caesarean section.5 For breech babies every case should be individualized and an informed parental discussion would be most appropriate. Adoption of stringent criteria for vaginal birth could help in balancing the ratio between caesarean section and vaginal delivery.

Six patients in this cross-sectional study had undergone a caesarean section for antepartum haemorrhage. For most cases of placenta previa caesarean sections optimize the neonatal outcome depending on the foetal maturity. In abruptio placentae, a higher caesarean rate of 50% may help to reduce foeto-maternal morbidity.6

Early recourse to caesarean section occurs in 10-20% of cases of severe PIH or eclampsia. However a multidisciplinary tertiary care and ventilatory support in intensive care units is equally vital for a safe maternal outcome.7

In conclusion, it would be ideal to initiate obstetric audits by interdepartmental meetings, to assess the intrinsic role of caesarean section in influencing the foetomaternal outcome. Use of standardized management guidelines and practice of evidence based obstetrics would definitely go a long way in balancing the rates of caesarean section.
 
REFERENCES
1
Asha Oumachigui : Changing Trends in Caesarean section. Obs and Gynaec Today 2002; VII.
2
ACOG committee opinion : Vaginal delivery after caesarean birth. Vol. No. 143 - Oct 1994. Committee on obstetric practice. Int J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 48 : 127.
3
Levens KJ, Cunningham FG, Nelson S, Roark M, et al. A prospective comparison of selective and universal electronic foetal monitoring in 34, 995 pregnancies. N Engl J Med 1986; 315 : 615-19.
4
O’Driscoll K, Foley M. Correlation of decrease in perinatal mortality and increase in caesarean section notes. Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1983; 61 : 1.
5
Lancet editorial. External Cephalic Version. Lancet 1984; 385.
6
Bhatt RV. Antepartum haemorrhage; Menon MKK, Devi PK, Rao KB. Post graduate obstetrics and Gynaecology, 4th edition, Madras; Orient Longman 1999; 19 : 106-20.
7
Varawalla NV, Jhanande S. A five year analysis of Eclamptic Cases. J Obstet Gynaecol India 1989; 39 : 513-515.
 
DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS IS MOST LIKELY WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF LONG FLIGHTS

Only in the first two weeks after a long haul flight. Thromboembolism after a long haul flight is small and that the average risk of death from flight related venous thromboembolism is around 1 per 2 million flights.

BMJ 2003; 327 : 1072
 

To Section TOC
Sponsor-Dr.Reddy's Lab