| |
Gut
stromal tumours (GST) are intramural bowel tumours of low malignant
potential. They were formerly known as leiomyomas or leiomyosarcomas.
They may remain asymptomatic and get detected on surgery or imaging
for an unrelated cause. They may present with gastrointestinal bleeding,
abdominal pain, bowel obstruction, weight loss, mass or perforation.
Computed Tomography (CT) has the highest sensitivity in detecting these
tumours amongst the available pre-operative diagnostic methods. The
only curative therapy is surgical excision. Smooth muscle tumours of
gut origin should be considered in the differential diagnosis of incidentally
noted indeterminate abdominal masses. Pre-operative percutaneous biopsy
risks peritoneal seeding and tumour rupture.
The distinction between benign and malignant is difficult on histology
hence complete local excision with negative histologic margins is recommended.
This principle should be followed whether the lesion is termed as GST,
leiomyoma or leiomyosarcoma. Metastatic disease is most common in liver
and peritoneum, metastasis to lymph nodes do not occur. Patients with
large (> 5 cms.) GST should have life long follow up including periodic
CT scan due to risk of recurrence and metastasis. |
| |
| CASE
REPORT |
A
68 year old man came with the complaint of pain in abdomen.
On examination a mobile lump was detected in the hypogastrium. Blood
counts and ESR were normal. Patient was sent for sonography of abdomen;
which showed a large mass lesion just superior to the urinary bladder,
it was predominantly hypoechoic with interspersed hyperechoic areas.
Colour doppler study showed vascularity in the lesion. Liver, spleen,
kidneys and other organs were normal. To evaluate this lesion a CT scan
was suggested. CT scan was performed with oral and intravenous iodinated
contrast media; it revealed a uniformly isodense mass lesion measuring
10 x 12 x 11 cms. It enhanced uniformly on intravenous contrast administration.
Origin of this lesion could not be determined. There were no areas of
calcification, necrosis or fat in the lesion. Bowel loops were displaced,
rest of the organs were unremarkable (had the patient been a female
a diagnosis of wandering fibroid would have been considered).
Diagnosis of mesenchymal neoplasm was made on the basis of these findings.
Patient was operated and at surgery a large pedunculated mass arising
from jejunum was found, the neoplasm showed peristaltic contractions
for almost 20 minutes after resection.
Frozen section was reported as leiomyoma which was subsequently reconfirmed
on the final histopathology report. |
| |
| DISCUSSION |
propria and muscularis
mucosae and may expand towards the bowel lumen, serosa or in both directions
(dumb bell shaped).3
The commonest site for these gastrointestinal stromal tumours is stomach
(39%) followed by small intestine (32%), rectum (10%), large intestine
(5%), others (mesentery, omental, oesophagus, diaphragm), intestine
unspecified (5%).4 In the small intestine it is commonest in the jejunum
followed by ileum, duodenum and Meckel’s diverticulum. Male to
female ratio is almost equal, the peak incidence being 50 to 59 years.2
Symptoms of GSTs are as follows - 41% are detected incidentally (autopsy
or surgery), 59% are symptomatic, the symptoms being as follows - gastrointestinal
bleeding (acute and chronic), abdominal pain, bowel obstruction, weight
loss, mass, perforation.3 Laboratory studies rarely reveal specific
abnormalities in patients with small bowel neoplasms.5
Commonly used procedures for diagnosis have been endoscopy and upper
gastrointestinal series, although these procedures have produced inconsistent
results in the past. Endoscopy was correct in 13% to 33% of the times
and barium contrast studies were correct 25% to 29%.2
An intramural leiomyoma is shown on barium studies as round smooth intraluminal
filling defect. A serosal neoplasm is recognized as a mass attached
to the intestine indenting the lumen and causing displacement of adjacent
barium filled loops of intestine. Dumbbell leiomyoma demonstrate the
combined features of intraluminal and serosal neoplasms.6 The main features
of leiomyosarcoma on barium examination is large cavity filled with
barium and it may be difficult to identify the connection between the
small intestine and cavity.6
Leiomyomas appear on CT as round sharply demarcated, homogeneous masses
that are chiefly extrinsic to the lumen. They are of uniform soft tissue
attenuation but a small proportion contain amorphous calcification.1
On CT, a leiomyosarcoma usually appears as a large, heterogeneous, predominantly
solid mass withmultiple cystic spaces (corresponding with areas of necrosis)
which exhibits intense enhancement of its solid components.7
Leiomyosarcomas have similar CT features, but may show metastases to
liver or spread to mesentery and peritoneum.1
Computed tomography is highly successful and when used detected 89.5%
of leiomyomas and 98% of leiomyosarcomas. Both tumour necrosis and ulceration
can be identified with this technique. As both benign and malignant
smooth muscle tumours undergo necrosis, CT cannot differentiate between
the two on this basis, but it can accurately measure the size of neoplasm.
Metastases, an important indicator of malignancy, are recognized by
CT and therefore help stage tumour progression.2
Selective angiography is useful for delineating subserosal tumours and
those that are actively bleeding.2
Ultrasonography has also been used to diagnose these neoplasms and can
locate intraluminal, intramural and extraluminal growth patterns (as
well as those tumours with dumbbell shape). It also detects metastases.2
Intraluminal gut masses may have a variable appearance on sonography
but are frequently hidden by gas or luminal content. In contrast gut
pathology creating an exophytic mass are more readily visualized.8 Smooth
muscle tumours typically procedure round mass lesions of varying size
and echogenecity and often with central cystic areas. Smooth muscle
tumours of gut origin should be considered in the differential diagnosis
of incidentally noted, indeterminate abdominal masses in asymptomatic
patients.8
Histologically, the distinction between benign and malignant tumours
is difficult to make and classification of malignancy is unreliable.
However two of the strongest pathologic predictors of malignant behaviour
are size (generally > 5 cms) and mitotic count (generally > 5
mitoses per high power field). Even small GST with a bland, benign appearance
may behave in a malignant fashion by extensive local invasion, local
recurrence or metastasis.
Thus all GSTs should be considered a low grade malignancy with a small
risk of recurrence and metastasis.3 Pre-operative percutaneous biopsy
carries the theoretical risk of peritoneal seeding or tumour rupture.4
Patients with a very large GST (> 5 cms) should have life long follow
up including periodic CT scan, due to risk of recurrence and metastasis.3
Metastatic disease is most common in liver and peritoneum. Metastasis
to local lymph nodes do not occur, thus there does not appear to be
a need for local lymph node dissection. As GSTs are usually radioresistant
and insensitive to chemotherapeutic agents the only curative therapy
is surgical excision.3
If one assumes that small GST will become larger and then symptomatic,
then the frequent, often severe complications experienced by the symptomatic
patient provide strong evidence to support excision of small, incidentally
found tumours as well as the larger GST. Local excision with negative
histological margins is recommended because of the low malignant potential
of GST. These principles should be followed whether the lesion is termed
a GST or leiomyoma/leiomyosarcoma.3 |
| |
| Reference |
| 1. |
Kohler RE, Memel DS, Stanley RJ. Gastrointestinal tract. In : Lee
KT, Stanley RJ, Sagel SS, Heinken JP, editors. Computed Body Tomography
with MRI correlation. 3rd ed., Philadelphia : Lippincott-Raven 1998;
1 : 659, 661-62.. |
| 2. |
Blanchard
DK, Budde JM, Hatch GF, et al. Tumours of small bowel. World J Surg
2000; 24 : 421-29. |
| 3. |
Ludwig
DJ, Traverso LW. Gut stromal tumours and their clinical behaviour.
Am J Surg 1997; 173 : 390-94.. |
| 4. |
De
Matteo RP, Lewis JJ, Leung D, et al. Two hundred gastrointestinal
stromal tumours : recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for
survival. Ann Surg 2000; 23 : 51-8. |
| 5. |
Sindelar WF. Cancer of the small intestine. In : De Vita Jr. VT,
Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, editors. Cancer principles and practice
of oncology. 3rd ed., Philadelphia: JB Lippincott company. 1989;
878-79, 882-83. |
| 6. |
Nolan
DJ. The small intestine. In : Grainger RG, Allison D, Baert A, Potchen
JE, editors. Grainger and Allison’s Diagnostic Radiology:
A textbook of medical imaging. 3rd ed., New York: Churchill Livingstone.
1999; 2 : 993-96 |
| 7. |
Nicolas
AI, Ross PR. Imaging of mesentery and omentum. In : Grainger RG,
Allison D, Baert A, Potchen JE, editors. Grainger and Allison’s
Diagnostic Radiology ; A textbook of medical imaging. 3rd ed., New
York : Churchill Livingstone 1999; 2 : 1062. |
| 8. |
Wilson
SR. The gastrointestinal tract. In : Rumak CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau
JW, editors. Diagnostic Ultrasound. 2nd ed., St. Louis : Mosby
1998; 1 : 282, 228. |
|
| |