| Home > Table
of Contents > Original
/ Research Articles |
| |
Diagnostic Importance of Antibodies TBIgG
and IgA and AdenosineDeaminase in Tuberculous
Pleural Effusion in Indian Population
JG Saluja*, MS Ajinkya**, S Khanna*** |
| |
Tuberculosis is still common in India
and Tuberculosis pleural effusion is one of the most common
forms of tuberculosis pleural effusion can be established.
Directly : By demonstrating tubercle bacilli
in pleural effusion fluid, or pleural biopsy, or Antigen or
Antibody detection in either sputum, pleural fluid by polymerase
chain reaction (PCR) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Indirectly : Evidence with granuloma in pleural
or increased level of pleural fluid Adenosine deaminase.
The
study of comparative diagnostic value of serum and pleural
effusion fluid. Antibody test (TBIgG, IgA) and adenosine
deaminase (ADA) test was done in age group above 14 years because
TBIgG titres in primary tuberculosis reported to be lower than
in post primary tuberculosis. The results obtained were showing
significant higher titres of Antibodies in pleural fluid than
serum Antibodies levels. Similarly Adenosine deaminase values
were found to have a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of
96% in pleural effusion than serum values. Therefore it is
concluded that it is possible to avoid pleural biopsy and do
pleural fluid ADA TBIgG, TBIgA to ascertain the diagnosis of
tubercular pleuritis.
|
| |
| INTRODUCTION |
Tuberculosis is a classic example of “host
parasite” relationship. The host response in tuberculosis
is the result of quantitative and qualitative interactions
to various constituents of the wall of the bacillus which
acting as foreign substance mobilize the immune response
of the host. The net result is due to the interplay of cell-mediated
immunity and delayed hypersensitivity.1
Tubercle bacilli, when they infect man are rapidly phagocytosed
by Polymorph-neutrophils cells, in which they rapidly multiply
and then kill them. Next, the battle is taken up by macrophages,
which are derived from bone marrow and constitute the reticuloendothelial
system. In lungs they are concentrated as alveolar macrophages,
which play an important role in defense against tubercle
bacilli. Macrophages are the body’s mechanism for
expressing Tuberculo-Immunity. But how, it is a mystery.
Later on it was established that lymphocytes from immune
animals were the “Affecter Cells”. It is proved
that immunity to tuberculosis was lymphokine mediated.
Lymphokines are produced by lymphocytes. The lymphocytes
modulate the functions of macrophages, T cells are the “Affecter
Cells” of cell-mediated immunity.2 They regulate
all types of response by either activity as helper or suppressor
cells. Tuberculosis is still common in India and tuberculosis
pleural effusion is one of the most common forms of extra
pulmonary tuberculosis. The diagnoses of tuberculosis pleural
effusion can be established directly by Demonstrating tubercle
bacilli in pleural effusion, fluid or pleural biopsy specimen
or Antibody or antigen detection in either sputum or pleural
fluid, pleural fluid polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for
mycobacterium tuberculosis
Indirect evidence with granuloma in pleura or increased
level of pleural fluid adenosine deaminase. A couple of
antigens secreted by M tuberculosis have been purified,
which are present both in inactive and active tuberculosis
e.g. 17 Kda to 80 Kda were recognized by the IgG antibodies
present in the plasma of active and inactive TB patients.
These antigens3,4 are responsible for increasing humoralresponse
(IgM, IgG, IgA) which usually peaks after the Tcell medicated
immune response has declined. This antibody response shows
promising results for the diagnoses of pulmonary and extra
pulmonary tuberculosis. However, recent reports have revealed
a discrepancy in different study populations.
The aim of
this study is to confirm the comparative diagnostic value
of serum and pleural fluid effusion, antibody test
(IgG, IgA) and ADA test in patients presenting with pleural
effusion.
|
| |
| Methodology |
Fifty patients who underwent diagnostic evaluation for
pleural effusion between March 1999 and March 2002 at Mumbadevi
Homoeopathic Hospital Pathology Laboratory along with 50
non-Tuberculous Pleural effusion (Lymphocytic) patients who
were enrolled in this study. The patients were aged 13 years
or more and were diagnosed as having pleural effusion by
clinical symptoms, physical examination and radiographic
evidence. Patients with clinical suspicion of human deficiency
virus co-infection were tested after counselling.
Pleural
tap was performed under local anaesthesia and aseptic precaution.
About
50 ml of fluid was collected
5 ml for cell count and differential
count
The diagnostic criteria were MT +ve, Pleural fluid TB
IgG, IgA +ve or -ve.
25 ml for protein and sugar
and adenine deaminase
5 ml for antibody estimation TB IgG,
IgA, by ELISA technique.
Simultaneously serum sample were
also collected for ADA and TB IgG, TB IgA were estimated
by ELISA (enzyme linked
immuno-sorbant Assay). Using Andaelisa mycobacterium karactac
kit Deaminase by deaminase kit by Giust’s method.
Pleural
fluid sugar, proteins by GODPOD and Biurete from Ranbaxy
Ltd. and Biolab Ltd. Mantoux test (intradermal
test) by using PPD from Span Diagnostic 10 Tu.
Lymphocyte count increased in pleural fluid, Protein increased;
sugar decreased in pleural fluid and haemorrhage in pleural
fluids were determined. Any one or two positive parameters
were considered for diagnosis.
|
| TB IgG values |
| Positive |
more than 225 units |
| Negative |
less than 125 units |
| Equivocal between |
125-225 units |
| TB IgA values |
| Greater |
1.2 units Positive |
| Less than |
0.8 units Negative |
| Between |
0.8-1.2 units Equivocal |
| Adenosine deaminase value above 70 units
were considered Positive MT Criteria Area induration and
Erythema |
No Induration
5.0 - 10.0 mm
10.0 - 15.0 mm
15.0 - 25.0 mm |
-ve
+ve
++ve
+++ve to ++++ve |
Mantoux Test
- Anergic (A)
- Reactive
- Intermediate Reactive (IR)
- Intermediate Anergic (IA) |
10 Tu
8%
58%
28%
6% |
| TB IgG |
99% +ve in Pleural Fluid
70% +ve in Serum
01% -ve in Pleural Fluid
30% -ve in Serum |
| TB IgA |
78% +ve in Pleural fluid
74% +ve in Serum
22% -ve Pleural Fluid
23% -ve in Serum
02% Borderline /Equivocal
(in Serum) |
| ADA |
96% +ve in Pleural Fluid
52% +ve in Serum
04% -ve in Pleural Fluid
48% -ve in Serum |
M IgG +ve IgA - ve
M IgG +ve IgA +ve
M (A) IgG +ve IgA -ve
M (IR) IgG +ve IgA -ve
M (A) IgG +ve IgA +ve |
6%
28%
2%
8%
0% |
|
| |
| Humoral antibody response in 3 HIV +ve
cases was good |
10 patients were showing AFB +ve of those
TBIgG values in pleural fluid were ranging 1000-2000
TBIgA values were +ve in 8 cases 6 in serum, 2 in pleural fluid
and Equivocal in 2 cases.
TBIgG value in serum were ranging 200-400 |
| |
| Results |
| |
| Control study of 50 Non-tuberculous pleural
effusion (Lymphocytic) shows following results |
| X-ray |
Old fibrotic lesion |
1 patient |
| |
Old fibrotic scar upper/
middle zone |
8 patients |
| |
Thickening of pleura |
2 patients |
| |
Infiltration lesion
healed |
1 patient |
Serum IgG
|
Upper limit of normal |
9 patients |
| |
Borderline |
3 patients |
| |
Equivocal |
1 patient |
| Serum IgA |
Equivocal |
6 patients |
| |
Borderline |
3 patients |
Pleural ADA
|
Positive |
2 patients |
| |
|
(Between 80-90) |
| From the above study the results were represented
in graphical form. |
|
| |
| Statistical Significance |
The significance of the above test was studied
i.e Pleural ADA Test with
respect to specificity and sensitivity. Where
in we took
-Positive Tubercular sample Pleural Effusion
sample as
Truely Positive of ADA = 48
False Positive ADA Test = 02
-Negative Tubercular Sample of Pleural effusion of
Lymphocytic Effusion (Non-Tuberculous
pts) was studied and following values were observed.
- Truly Negative = 48
False Negative = 02
On this basis Sensitivity/Specificity is calculated
Sensitivity = 96%
Specificity = 96%
Positive predictive value of test = 96%
Negative predictive value = 96%
Positive diagnostic ratios (DLR) = 24
Negative (DLR) = 0.04 |
Fig
1

Fig 2

Fig 3 |
|
| |
| Discussion |
Tuberculosis is entirely regulated by
cell mediated immune response (CMI) of the host. When bacillary
antigens are present at low levels the CMI response causes
macrophages to accumulate, get activated and then destroy
the bacilli. When the bacillary antigen are present at high
levels the CMI response causes necrosis of tissue.5-6
Immune
response against myc. Tuberculosis involves both macrophages
and lymphocytes, dead organism, are broken
down relatively within the granuloma, releasing large quantities
of glyco-lipid and polysaccharides, antigen into the draining
lymphnodes leads to predominately humoral immune response.
But
viable mycobacterium release small quantities of glycoproteins,
antigen which induces a delayed hyper sensitivity
and cell mediated immune response.
When more and more tubercle
bacilli are killed by the immune host, good amount of glycolipid
and polysaccharide
antigens are released from the cell wall of Mycobacterium
Tuberculosis. These antigens are responsible for increasing
humoral response (IgM IgA) which peak after the T cell
mediated immune response has declined.7,8
TBIgA has a potent
inflammatory potential. Immune complexes with IgA activate
complement and can trigger inflammation
in different organs. During an infection (Asymptomatic
or overt), the production of IgA antibodies occur usually
after the initial surge of IgM antibodies. The presence
of IgA antibodies occur usually after the initial surge
of IgM antibodies. The presence of IgA antibodies in the
serum, sputum other biological fluids of tuberculosis patients
indicates that the immunological response of these patients
has been partially or totally misdirected, on rare occasions,
it is the only specific antibody that can be detected.
Its search is thus warranted when an immune anergy has
depressed the synthesis of IgM and IgG antibodies.9-12
In
tuberculosis patients suffering from extrapulmonary infections.
The presence of IgA antibodies detected in
body fluids at a 1:20 dilution (pleural fluid, pericardial
etc.) is a sure sign of a mycobacterial infection and its
detection in these fluids is, in difficult cases a precious
diagnostic clue that complements the seric detection of
TBIgM antibodies.13,14
TBIgG antibodies appear when an infection
becomes established. This indicates a good immunological
response of the patients
to the infection.
TBIgM plus TBIgG measurements are analyzed together to
detect reactivation cases in chronic infection.
TBIgM plus
TBIgG measurements are analyzed together to detect reactivation
cases in chronic infection.
TBIgG antibodies are routinely
analysed in chronic infection and during therapy. They
give an evaluation of the activity
of the disease. A successful therapy, is often accompanied
by an increase in IgG titres, followed of course by a decrease
at the end of the therapy.15-16 Persistence of low levels
of antibodies after therapy is supposed to indicate the
presence of non-evacuated antigenic pouches. TBIgA antibodies
are applied in difficult cases presenting an anergy i.e.
lack of tuberculin reactivity and no synthesis of IgG antibodies
TBIgA antibodies strengthen the diagnosis in cases of suspected
meningitis, pleuritis and pericarditis renal tuberculosis
and AIDS syndrome.16
In the present study pleural fluid
TBIgG and TBIgA antibodies and ADA values were significantly
higher than in serum.
Higher Titres of TBIgG were supposed
to be due to active disease which can be clearly distinguish
from control.
TBIgG (Anti 60 to IgG) were supposed to be more specific
than total IgG levels. Many workers have reported lower
IgG titres in primary tuberculosis than in past primary
tuberculosis. This might be the reason of low positivity
in 0-14 yrs of age group patients as chances of primary
TB aremore in younger patient11-12 Patel et al have been
also reported low of sero positivity in childhood tuberculosis.5-8
ADA
levels in non-tubercular lymph pleural effusion seldom
exceeds the diagnostic cut off for TB effusion.17-19 ADA
levels cannot be predicted from total or differentiated
Leucocyte count. ADA is stable in effusion fluid and it
is measurement in reproducible in pleural fluid ADA were
significantly higher in TB as compared with control group.
Pleural fluid ADA were higher than serum ADA in TB as compared
with control group.20-23
Pleural fluid ADA was found to
have a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 96%. The mean
values of pleural
fluid ADA in tuberculosis group were higher positive, which
was significantly higher than control group. Because of
low sensitivity of microscopic examination of pleural fluid
for tubercular bacilli. Pleural fluid ADA may be investigation
of choice in diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis and pleural
biopsy in selected cases.24-26
From the study it is concluded
that it is possible to avoid pleural biopsy and do pleural
fluid ADA, TBIgA TBIgG
to ascertain the diagnosis of Tubercular Pleuritis.
|
| |
| Acknowledgement |
| We are grateful to the Dean Dr. SK Goel for giving
permission to publish the data. We also express the deep gratitude
to Mr. Leroy Rebello (Student of III year medicine). Dr. Prachi
Bedekar Junior Lecturer of Pathology and Mrs. Uma A Clerk (Pathology
staff) from RRI for helping us in preparing the manuscript
and reference work. |
| |
| References |
| 1. |
Butreau JW. Nosocomial urinary
tract infection. Progress on urologic 1997; 7 (4) : 674-82. |
| 2. |
Carlo G Cocito. Properties of mycobacterial
antigen complex A60 and its application to diagnosis
and prognosis of tuberculosis. Chest 1991; 100 : 1687 |
| 3. |
Grange JM. The humoral immune response
in tuberculosis: its nature biological role and diagnostic
usefulness adv. Tuberculosis Res 1984; 21 : 1. |
| 4. |
Kramabovitis E. Serodiagnosis of tuberculosis
in perspective. Serodiagnostic Immuno Ther 1987; 1 :
7. |
| 5. |
Jacketi PS, Bothamley GH, Batra HV, et
al. Specificities of antibodies to immunodominant mycobacterial
antigens in pulmonary tuberculosis. J Clinical Microbiology
1998; 26 : 2323. |
| 6. |
Patel AB, Rawat MS, et al. ELISA for diagnosis
of tuberculosis. Indian Pediatr 1990; 27 (6) : 585 M27
: 164. |
| 7. |
Singh MM, et al. ELISA in the diagnosis
of pulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Chest Disease All
Sci 1985; m27 : 164. |
| 8. |
Nagesh S Babu, Sehgal Shobha, et al. Evaluation
of polymerase Chain Reaction for detection of Mycobacterium
tuberculosis in pleural fluid. Chest 2001; 119 : 1737. |
| 9. |
Brennan PJ. Structure of mycobacteria
recent development in defining cell wall carbohydrates
and proteins. Rev Infect Dis 1989; 11 (Suppl 12) : v5420 |
| 10. |
Charpin D, Charpin J, et al. Value of
Elisa using A 60 Antigen in the diagnosis of Active Pulmonary
Tuberculosis. American Review of Respiratory Disease
1990; 142 : 380-84. |
| 11. |
Bogers W, Stad RK. Complement inflamm
1991; 8 : 347-58. |
| 12. |
Ferreira P, Soares R, et al. Internet
Immune 1991; 3 : 445-52. |
| 13. |
Wayne L, et al. Immunoglobulin A (IgA)
and IgG serum antibodies to mycobacterial antigens in
Crohn’s disease patients and their relatives. Clinical
Microbial 1992; 30 : 2013-18. |
| 14. |
Zou YL, Zhang JD, et al. Serological analysis
of pulmonary and extra pulmonary tuberculosis with enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assays for Anti - 60 Immunoglobulins. Clinical
Infection Disease 1994; 19 : 1084-91. |
| 15. |
Kaustova J. Serological IgG, IgM and IgA.
Diagnosis and Prognosis of Mycobacterial Disease in Routine
Practice. Euro J Med Disease 1995; 961 : 393-403. |
| 16. |
Maes HH, Maes RF, et al. Mycobacterial
infections are the observed enigmas and paradoxes explained
by immuno suppression and immunodeficiency? Medical hypothesis
1996; 46 : 163-71. |
| 17. |
Gupta S, Kumar S, et al. Diagnostic utility
of the estimation of Mycobacterial Antigen 60 Specific
Immunoglobulins IgM, IgA and IgG in the sera of cases
of adult human tuberculosis. Tubercle and Lung Disease
1995; 76 : 418-24. |
| 18. |
Lee YC, Rogers JT, Miller KD, et al. Adenosine
deaminase levels in non-tuberculosis lymphocyte pleural
effusion. Chest 2001; 120 (2) : 334-6. |
| 19. |
Fijalkowsk, Graczyk M. Tuberculous pleurisy-still
difficult diagnostic problem. Pol Mer Kuriusz Lek 2001;
11 (63) : 389-93. |
| 20. |
Chierakul N, Damrongchokpioat R, et al.
Antibody detection for diagnosis of tuberculosis pleuritis.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2001; 5 (10) : 968-72. |
| 21. |
Gronge JM. The humoral immune response
in tuberculosis its nature, biological role and diagnostic
usefulness. Adv Tuberc Res 1984; 163 : 10224. |
| 22. |
Reechaipichit kul w Kawamatawong, et al.
Diagnostic role of pleural fluid adenosine deaminase
in tuberculous pleural effusion. Southeast Asian J Trop
Med Public Health 2001; 32 (2) : 383-9. |
| 23. |
Luzze H, Elliot AM, Joloba ML, et al.
Evaluation of suspected tuberculosis pleurisy: Clinical
and diagnostic findings in HIV 1 positive and HIV negative
adults in Uganda. Int J Tuber Lung Disease 2001; 5 (8)
: 746-53. |
| 24. |
Lawn SD, Pisell TL, et al. Anatomically
compartmentalized human immunodeficiency virus replication
in HLA DR +cells and CD 14 + macrophages at the site
of pleural tuberculosis coinfection. J Infect Dis 2001;
1 : 184 (9) : 1127-33. |
| 25. |
Sharma SK, Suresh V, Mohan A, et al. A
perspective study of sensitivity and specificity in the
diagnosis of tuberculosis pleural effusion. Indian J
Chest Dis Allied Sci 2001; 43 (3) : 149-55. |
| 26. |
Carrion - Valero F, Perpina-Tordera N.
Screening of tuberculous pleural effusion by discriminant
analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2001; 5 (7) : 673-9. |
| 27. |
Hubbard RD, Flory CM, et al. Immunization
of mice with mycobacterial culture filtrate proteins.
Clin Exp Immunol 1991; 187 : 94. |
| 28. |
Rapid Diagnostic Tests : Accurate Diagnostic
Tests. http://www.Rapid diagnostic.org/accuracy.htm. |
|
Hospitals in India woo foreign patients
The British woman is among a growing number
of foreigners turning to private tertiary care hospitals
in India
for medical treatment,
which is leading to health tourism. Large hospitals in Mumbai,
Chennai and New Delhi have long been receiving patients from
neighbouring South Asian and Gulf countries. Now they are trying
to attract patients from Africa, Europe, and North America,
marketing themselves as centres capable of delivering world
class medical services at low cost.
The Indian government has
also signalled its intention to promote medical tourism,
but this has evoked criticism
from health sector analysts. “Where is the
logic of the government spending energy and effort
to attract foreign patients for the private sector
when an over-whelming majority of patients in India
have inadequate access to health care.”
Whether
it is for cataract or cardiac surgery, dental treatment,
or hip replacement operations,
treatment cost in India is a fraction of what an
identical procedure would cost in Europe or North
America.
The Escorts Heart Institute is among the
hospitals approved by the UK medical insurance company
BUPA.
BMJ, 2004; 328 : 1338.
|
|
|
|