Bombay Hospital Journal ContentsHomeArchivesSearchBooksFeedback


Home > Table of Contents > Original / Research Articles
 
Prediction of Preterm Labour by Transvaginal Sonography
SJ Kore*, Sanjay Rao**, Ashwini Bhagwat***, Prachi Gujarathi***, VR Ambiye****, VR Badhwar+
 

The accurate prediction, prophylaxis and management of preterm labour is a challenge for every obstetrician. The present study conducted at a multidisciplinary tertiary institute correlates cervical length and diameter of the internal os measured by transvaginal sonography with the occurrence of preterm labour. Transvaginal sonography is a cost-effective mode of investigation to predict the risk of preterm labour. In 80% low risk patients, USG cervical length done at 23 weeks, out of 69 patients with cervical length more than 30 mm, only 7.2% delivered preterm, while in women with cervical length less than 30 mm, 91% patients delivered preterm.

 
INTRODUCTION

Preterm labour is defined as the onset of labour before 37 completed weeks of gestation counting from the first day of the last menstrual period.1 The incidence varies from 10 to 15 per cent of all pregnancies. Despite advances in medicine, the accurate prediction, prophylaxis and management of preterm labour has remained a unique challenge for every obstetrician. Preterm birth is a leading cause of perinatal mortality in India. Though survival has improved with sophisticated neonatal care, the cost of therapy may not be affordable in a developing nation like ours. In addition, survivors of extreme prematurity may still face considerable long term morbidity in later life.

 
Material and Methods
1. A prospective ongoing study to determine correlation to cervical length with period of gestation at delivery was conducted at the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, in a multidisciplinary tertiary institute, over a period of one year.
2. Eighty asymptomatic, low risk antenatal women were included in the study group.
3. Only patients registering early with definitely known LMP were included.
4. Patients of multiple pregnancy or past history of second trimester loss or preterm delivery were excluded.
5. Patients were explained the procedure and a prior consent for TVS was procured. Sonographic scanning was done on emptybladder, in dorsal position.
6. A cervical assessment with TVS for measurement of cervical length and diameter of internal os was done at 22-24 weeks gestation. Sonographic examination was done using 7.5 mHz Toshiba transvaginal probe.
7. The vaginal probe was negotiated to obtain sagittal view of entire cervix with echogenic endocervical mucosa along the length of cervical canal. Care was taken to avoid undue pressure on the cervix. Calipers were used to measure distance between triangular echogenicity of the external os and ‘V’ shaped notch of internal os. Three measurements were taken and the shortest distance was considered. Internal os diameter was measured. Internal os was considered as ‘open’ if the diameter exceeded 5 mm

All patients were regularly followed up in our ante-natal clinic, till delivery. The findings of cervical assessment were then correlated with period of gestation at delivery. Preterm delivery was defined as delivery before 37 completed weeks. The statistical analysis was done using paired-t test. Patients developing any high risk factor or requiring delivery for any other obstetric indications were excluded from the study.

All patients were regularly followed up in our ante-natal clinic, till delivery. The findings of cervical assessment were then correlated with period of gestation at delivery. Preterm delivery was defined as delivery before 37 completed weeks. The statistical analysis was done using paired-t test. Patients developing any high risk factor or requiring delivery for any other obstetric indications were excluded from the study.

 
Results

Majority of the patients were in the age group of 20-30 years. Of the 80 patients, there were 37 primigravidae and 43 multigravidae. Cervical assessment by TVS was done at 23-24 weeks of gestation in all patients.

Table 1 : Cervical length
     
     
Parity
No. Cervical length in MM
     
     
Primis 37 36.5
Multis 43 38.4
     
     

Average cervical length in primigravidae was 36.5 mm, while it was 38.4 mm in multigravidae.

Table 2 : Occurrence of preterm delivery
         
         
Group
Cervical length No. of patients No. of Patients delivering preterm %
         
         
A ³ 3 CM
69 5 7.2
B < 3 11 10 91
         
         

According to measurement of cervical length, patients were categorised into two groups, for analysis. Group-A comprised women with cervical length of 3 cm or more, while patients with cervical length of less than 3 cm were categorised as Group - B. Thus, we had 69 women in group A and 11 in group B. All these 80 patients were followed up till delivery.

Table 3 : Correlation with period of gestation at delivery
         
         
Group
No. of patients Preiod of gestation (weeks)
    28-32 33-36 >36
         
         
A 69
5 (7.3%) 64 (92.7%)
B 11 4 (36.3%) 6 (54.7%) 1 (9%)
         
         

The average period of gestation at delivery in group A was more than 36 weeks, while it was 33.36 weeks in group B. Only 5 out of 61 patients (7.2%) had a preterm delivery, all delivering between 33-35 weeks. While in group B, 10 of 11 women (91%) delivered before 37 weeks of gestation. Only 4 of these 10 cases, delivered before 32 weeks of gestation.

Table 3 : Correlation with period of gestation at delivery
         
         
Group
Internal os Nos. POG in weeks at delivery
    28-32 33-36 >36
         
         
  Closed 61 61
           
A (N-69) Open (Funelling) 8 5 3
  Closed 2 1 1
           
B (n-11) Open (Funelling) 9 4 5
         
         

In Group B 4 of them delivered between 28-32 weeks and 5 delivered between 33-36 weeks. Out of 2 remaining cases without funnelling, one delivered at 35 weeks. Thus, all 9 cases with cervical length less than 3 cm with presence of funnelling delivered preterm (100%).

 
Discussion

Due to a diverse aetiopathogenesis, prevention of preterm labour has had limited success. Various studies including nutritional support, health advices, and intensive education have had limited success.
Despite the availability of aggressive treatment protocols and pharmacological interventions, preterm labour remains one of the common causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality. The main reason for low success rates of tocolytic therapy is failure to detect the onset of preterm labour in patients at an early stage. Thus, it becomes essential to identify patients, both symptomatic or asymptomatic, early enough so that optimum treatment in form of tocolysis or cerclage can be attempted along with prophylactic antibiotics.
Preterm labour has certain demographic or obstetric high risk factors. Digital examination of cervix, with assessment of uterine contractions along with these high risk factors is used for prediction of preterm labour.2,5 Unfortunately, these methods are subjective, inaccurate and thus neither sensitive nor specific. As a result of incorrect clinical assessment, some of these may lead to the patient being unnecessarily hospitalised, or receiving treatment that may be detrimental or even dangerous to both mother and foetus. On the other hand some patients may have a late institution of tocolytic therapy, thus adversely affecting the success of tocolysis.
It would be desirable to have more objective methods that could accurately and rapidly identify patients at risk of preterm labour. A number of methods have been proposed - such as the evaluation of presence of cervico-vaginal foetal fibronectin,6,11 direct or indirect assessment of subclinical infection including bacterial vaginosis7 and assessment of cervical or amniotic fluid cytokine concentration.8 However, most of these techniques require expensive assays and are often unavailable in developing countries like ours.
Ultrasonographic assessment of uterine cervix has emerged as an alternate method to objectively assess cervical length and morphology for prediction of preterm labour.5,9 Use of trans-abdominal sonography is not advantageous for determination of cervical length because it requires a full bladder and is less accurate. Also, the pressure of a full bladder itself can alter the finding. Transvaginal sonography, which can provide high quality image is well accepted by patients.10
Trans-vaginal sonography can be used as a reliable and cost effective screeing procedure in both low and high risk asymptomatic patients, at risk of developing preterm labour at 23-24 week. While in symptomatic patients, it can select who are really at risk and require indoor management.
A number of studies have proved in the role of cervical assessment by sonography in prediction of preterm labour.9,10 Though, various authors have used different cut-off values of cervical length and period of gestation at which it is done, 26-30 mm of cervical length at 23-26 weeks is a more accepted practice with good sensitivity and specificity.5,9,10 Though the present study group is small in number, it confirms these findings. The predictive value can be further enhanced by calculating ‘cervical index’ as proposed by Gomez et al.5 Correlation with increased levels of foetal fibronectin can increase the predictive value of this method.6,11

 
Conclusion
Ultrasonographic assessment of cervix has a promising role to offer in the prediction of the risk of the developing preterm labour. Considering the magnitude of preterm labour, cost of management of preterm babies and morbidity-mortality associated with it, the use of ultrasonographic assessment of cervix at 23-24 weeks as routine screening method is cost effective and should be offered to all pregnant women.
 
References
1. Rush RW, Keirse MJNC, Howatt P, Baun JD, Anderson AB, Turnbull AC. Contribution of preterm delivery of perinatal mortality. Br Med J 1976; 2 : 965-8.
2. Creasy RK. Preterm birth prevention: where are we? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168 : 1223-30.
3. King JF, Grant A, Keirse MNC, Chalmers I. Beta-mimetics in preterm labour: a overview of the randomised controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 95 : 211-22.
4. Savitz DA, Blackmore CA, Thorpe JM. Epidemiologic characteristics of preterm labour. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164 : 467-71.
5. Gibbs RS, Romero R, Hillier SL, Sweet RL. A review of premature birth and subclinical infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166 : 1015-28.
6. Lockwood CJ, Ghidini A, Wein R, Lipinsky R, Berkowitz RL. Increased interleukin-6 concentration in cervical secretions are associated with preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171 : 1097-1102
7. Anderson A, Turnbull A. Prediction of risk of preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163 : 869-67.
8. Okitsu O, Mimura T, Nakayama T, Aono T. Early prediction of preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992; 2 : 402-9.
9. Gomez R, Galasso M, Romero R, et al. Ultrasonographic examination of the cervix is better than digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of preterm delivery in patients with preterm labour and intact membrane. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171 : 956-64.
10. Guzman ER, Rosenberg JC, Houlinan C. A new method using transvaginal sonography and transfundal pressure to evaluate the asymptomatic incompetent cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:248-52.
11. Rizzo G, Capponi A, Arduni D, Lorido C, Romanini C. The value of fetal fibronectin of cervical and vaginal secretion and of ultrasonographic examination of uterine cervix in predicting premature delivery in patient with preterm labour and intact membrane. 1996; 175 : 761-70.

 

Disappointment in donepezil

More effective treatment are needed for Alzheimer’s disease’

Donepezil was the first cholinesterase inhibitor to be licensed in the UK for Alzheimer’s disease. The AD2000 Collaborative Group did a study to determine whether it produces worthwhile improvements in non-cognitive and behavioural symptoms, and is a cost-effective treatment. While the drug produced small improvements in cognition and activities of daily living in patients with this disease, no measurable reduction in rate of institutionalisation or progress of disability was recorded. The investigators conclude that donepezil is not cost effective, with benefits below minimally relevant thresholds, and clinicians should question routine prescription of cholinesterase inhibitors. In a Commentary, Lon Schneider suggests that long-term trials should be done to compare cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, aspirin, ginkgo biloba, and other drugs.

Lancet, 2004; 4 : 2100, 2105.