| Home > Table
of Contents > Original
/ Research Articles |
| |
Prediction of Preterm Labour by Transvaginal
Sonography
SJ Kore*, Sanjay Rao**, Ashwini Bhagwat***, Prachi
Gujarathi***, VR Ambiye****, VR Badhwar+ |
| |
The accurate prediction, prophylaxis
and management of preterm labour is a challenge for every obstetrician.
The present study conducted at a multidisciplinary tertiary
institute correlates cervical length and diameter of the internal
os measured by transvaginal sonography with the occurrence
of preterm labour. Transvaginal sonography is a cost-effective
mode of investigation to predict the risk of preterm labour.
In 80% low risk patients, USG cervical length done at 23 weeks,
out of 69 patients with cervical length more than 30 mm, only
7.2% delivered preterm, while in women with cervical length
less than 30 mm, 91% patients delivered preterm.
|
| |
| INTRODUCTION |
Preterm labour is defined as the onset of
labour before 37 completed weeks of gestation counting from
the first day of the last menstrual period.1 The incidence
varies from 10 to 15 per cent of all pregnancies. Despite
advances in medicine, the accurate prediction, prophylaxis
and management of preterm labour has remained a unique challenge
for every obstetrician. Preterm birth is a leading cause
of perinatal mortality in India. Though survival has improved
with sophisticated neonatal care, the cost of therapy may
not be affordable in a developing nation like ours. In addition,
survivors of extreme prematurity may still face considerable
long term morbidity in later life.
|
| |
| Material and Methods |
| 1. |
A prospective ongoing study
to determine correlation to cervical length with period
of gestation at delivery was conducted at the department
of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, in a multidisciplinary
tertiary institute, over a period of one year. |
| 2. |
Eighty asymptomatic, low risk antenatal
women were included in the study group. |
| 3. |
Only patients registering early with definitely
known LMP were included. |
| 4. |
Patients of multiple pregnancy or past
history of second trimester loss or preterm delivery
were excluded. |
| 5. |
Patients were explained the procedure
and a prior consent for TVS was procured. Sonographic
scanning was done on emptybladder, in dorsal position. |
| 6. |
A cervical assessment with TVS for measurement
of cervical length and diameter of internal os was done
at 22-24 weeks gestation. Sonographic examination was
done using 7.5 mHz Toshiba transvaginal probe. |
| 7. |
The vaginal probe was negotiated to obtain
sagittal view of entire cervix with echogenic endocervical
mucosa along the length of cervical canal. Care was taken
to avoid undue pressure on the cervix. Calipers were
used to measure distance between triangular echogenicity
of the external os and ‘V’ shaped notch of
internal os. Three measurements were taken and the shortest
distance was considered. Internal os diameter was measured.
Internal os was considered as ‘open’ if the
diameter exceeded 5 mm |
All patients were regularly followed up in our ante-natal
clinic, till delivery. The findings of cervical assessment
were then correlated with period of gestation at delivery.
Preterm delivery was defined as delivery before 37 completed
weeks. The statistical analysis was done using paired-t
test. Patients developing any high risk factor or requiring
delivery for any other obstetric indications were excluded
from the study.
All patients were regularly followed up
in our ante-natal clinic, till delivery. The findings of
cervical assessment
were then correlated with period of gestation at delivery.
Preterm delivery was defined as delivery before 37 completed
weeks. The statistical analysis was done using paired-t
test. Patients developing any high risk factor or requiring
delivery for any other obstetric indications were excluded
from the study.
|
| |
| Results |
Majority of the patients were in the
age group of 20-30 years. Of the 80 patients, there were
37 primigravidae and 43 multigravidae. Cervical assessment
by TVS was done at 23-24 weeks of gestation in all patients.
| Table 1 : Cervical length |
| |
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
Parity
|
No. |
Cervical length in MM |
| |
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
| Primis |
37 |
36.5 |
| Multis |
43 |
38.4 |
| |
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
Average cervical length in primigravidae was 36.5
mm, while it was 38.4 mm in multigravidae.
| Table 2 : Occurrence of preterm
delivery |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Group
|
Cervical length |
No. of patients |
No. of Patients
delivering preterm |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| A |
³ 3 CM
|
69 |
5 |
7.2 |
| B |
< 3 |
11 |
10 |
91 |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
According to measurement of cervical
length, patients were categorised into two groups, for
analysis. Group-A
comprised women with cervical length of 3 cm or more,
while patients with cervical length of less than 3 cm were
categorised
as Group - B. Thus, we had 69 women in group A and 11
in group B. All these 80 patients were followed up till
delivery.
| Table 3 : Correlation with period of
gestation at delivery |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Group
|
No. of patients |
Preiod of gestation (weeks) |
| |
|
28-32 |
33-36 |
>36 |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| A |
69
|
— |
5 (7.3%) |
64 (92.7%) |
| B |
11 |
4 (36.3%) |
6 (54.7%) |
1 (9%) |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
The average period of gestation at delivery in group A
was more than 36 weeks, while it was 33.36 weeks in group
B. Only 5 out of 61 patients (7.2%) had a preterm delivery,
all delivering between 33-35 weeks. While in group B, 10
of 11 women (91%) delivered before 37 weeks of gestation.
Only 4 of these 10 cases, delivered before 32 weeks of
gestation.
| Table 3 : Correlation with period
of gestation at delivery |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Group
|
Internal os |
Nos. |
POG in weeks at delivery |
| |
|
28-32 |
33-36 |
>36 |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Closed |
61 |
— |
— |
61 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| A (N-69) |
Open (Funelling) |
8 |
— |
5 |
3 |
| |
Closed |
2 |
— |
1 |
1 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| B (n-11) |
Open (Funelling) |
9 |
4 |
5 |
— |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
In Group B 4 of them delivered between 28-32 weeks and
5 delivered between 33-36 weeks. Out of 2 remaining cases
without funnelling,
one delivered at 35 weeks. Thus, all 9 cases with cervical
length less than 3 cm with presence of funnelling delivered
preterm (100%). |
| |
| Discussion |
Due to a diverse aetiopathogenesis, prevention
of preterm labour has had limited success. Various studies
including nutritional support, health advices, and intensive
education have had limited success.
Despite the availability of aggressive treatment protocols and pharmacological
interventions, preterm labour remains one of the common causes of perinatal
morbidity and mortality. The main reason for low success rates of tocolytic
therapy is failure to detect the onset of preterm labour in patients
at an early stage. Thus, it becomes essential to identify patients, both
symptomatic or asymptomatic, early enough so that optimum treatment in
form of tocolysis or cerclage can be attempted along with prophylactic
antibiotics.
Preterm labour has certain demographic or obstetric high risk factors.
Digital examination of cervix, with assessment of uterine contractions
along with these high risk factors is used for prediction of preterm
labour.2,5 Unfortunately, these methods are subjective, inaccurate and
thus neither sensitive nor specific. As a result of incorrect clinical
assessment, some of these may lead to the patient being unnecessarily
hospitalised, or receiving treatment that may be detrimental or even
dangerous to both mother and foetus. On the other hand some patients
may have a late institution of tocolytic therapy, thus adversely affecting
the success of tocolysis.
It would be desirable to have more objective methods that could accurately
and rapidly identify patients at risk of preterm labour. A number of
methods have been proposed - such as the evaluation of presence of cervico-vaginal
foetal fibronectin,6,11 direct or indirect assessment of subclinical
infection including bacterial vaginosis7 and assessment of cervical or
amniotic fluid cytokine concentration.8 However, most of these techniques
require expensive assays and are often unavailable in developing countries
like ours.
Ultrasonographic assessment of uterine cervix has emerged as an alternate
method to objectively assess cervical length and morphology for prediction
of preterm labour.5,9 Use of trans-abdominal sonography is not advantageous
for determination of cervical length because it requires a full bladder
and is less accurate. Also, the pressure of a full bladder itself can
alter the finding. Transvaginal sonography, which can provide high quality
image is well accepted by patients.10
Trans-vaginal sonography can be used as a reliable and cost effective
screeing procedure in both low and high risk asymptomatic patients, at
risk of developing preterm labour at 23-24 week. While in symptomatic
patients, it can select who are really at risk and require indoor management.
A number of studies have proved in the role of cervical assessment by
sonography in prediction of preterm labour.9,10 Though, various authors
have used different cut-off values of cervical length and period of gestation
at which it is done, 26-30 mm of cervical length at 23-26 weeks is a
more accepted practice with good sensitivity and specificity.5,9,10 Though
the present study group is small in number, it confirms these findings.
The predictive value can be further enhanced by calculating ‘cervical
index’ as proposed by Gomez et al.5 Correlation with increased
levels of foetal fibronectin can increase the predictive value of this
method.6,11
|
| |
| Conclusion |
| Ultrasonographic assessment of cervix has a promising
role to offer in the prediction of the risk of the developing
preterm labour. Considering the magnitude of preterm labour,
cost of management of preterm babies and morbidity-mortality
associated with it, the use of ultrasonographic assessment
of cervix at 23-24 weeks as routine screening method is cost
effective and should be offered to all pregnant women. |
| |
| References |
| 1. |
Rush RW, Keirse MJNC, Howatt
P, Baun JD, Anderson AB, Turnbull AC. Contribution of
preterm delivery of perinatal mortality. Br Med J 1976;
2 : 965-8. |
| 2. |
Creasy RK. Preterm birth prevention: where
are we? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168 : 1223-30. |
| 3. |
King JF, Grant A, Keirse MNC, Chalmers
I. Beta-mimetics in preterm labour: a overview of the
randomised controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1988;
95 : 211-22. |
| 4. |
Savitz DA, Blackmore CA, Thorpe JM. Epidemiologic
characteristics of preterm labour. Am J Obstet Gynecol
1991; 164 : 467-71. |
| 5. |
Gibbs RS, Romero R, Hillier SL, Sweet
RL. A review of premature birth and subclinical infection.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166 : 1015-28. |
| 6. |
Lockwood CJ, Ghidini A, Wein R, Lipinsky
R, Berkowitz RL. Increased interleukin-6 concentration
in cervical secretions are associated with preterm delivery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171 : 1097-1102 |
| 7. |
Anderson A, Turnbull A. Prediction of
risk of preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement
of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163 : 869-67. |
| 8. |
Okitsu O, Mimura T, Nakayama T, Aono T.
Early prediction of preterm delivery by transvaginal
ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992; 2 :
402-9. |
| 9. |
Gomez R, Galasso M, Romero R, et al. Ultrasonographic
examination of the cervix is better than digital examination
as a predictor of the likelihood of preterm delivery
in patients with preterm labour and intact membrane.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171 : 956-64. |
| 10. |
Guzman ER, Rosenberg JC, Houlinan C. A
new method using transvaginal sonography and transfundal
pressure to evaluate the asymptomatic incompetent cervix.
Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:248-52. |
| 11. |
Rizzo G, Capponi A, Arduni D, Lorido C,
Romanini C. The value of fetal fibronectin of cervical
and vaginal secretion and of ultrasonographic examination
of uterine cervix in predicting premature delivery in
patient with preterm labour and intact membrane. 1996;
175 : 761-70. |
Disappointment in donepezil
More effective treatment are needed for Alzheimer’s
disease’
Donepezil was the first cholinesterase inhibitor
to be licensed in the UK for Alzheimer’s disease.
The AD2000 Collaborative Group did a study to determine
whether it produces worthwhile improvements in non-cognitive
and behavioural symptoms, and is a cost-effective
treatment. While the drug produced small improvements
in cognition and activities of daily living in patients
with this disease, no measurable reduction in rate
of institutionalisation or progress of disability
was recorded. The investigators conclude that donepezil
is not cost effective, with benefits below minimally
relevant thresholds, and clinicians should question
routine prescription of cholinesterase inhibitors.
In a Commentary, Lon Schneider suggests that long-term
trials should be done to compare cholinesterase inhibitors,
memantine, aspirin, ginkgo biloba, and other drugs.
Lancet, 2004; 4 : 2100, 2105.
|
|
|
|