Most of the family physicians are aware about
coronary angioplasty.Now, I want the family physicians to know
about angioplasty procedure (with or without stent) done in
gastroenterology practice. Remember that there are very few
gastroenterologists and interventional radiologists, who can
do this difficult procedure TIPSS. It is done through internal
jugular vein, where after putting the catheter in the inferior
vena cava, the hepatic vein is reached and obstructions are
removed by doing angioplasty and a stent (or any other gadget
in case of IVC) is inserted. It may also be put between the
biggest vein of the hepatic venous circulation and portal circulation.
This procedure could be as costly as a cardiac procedure.
Just as coronary angioplasty with stent may close and need
a second intervention, same thing is quite common in TIPSS.
In fact, sometimes, instead of opening a blocked/narrow stent,
a wide stent is narrowed after the procedure.
The following patients should be sent for consideration for
TIPSS:
- Patients, whose portal hypertension does not respond to
i. Medical line of treatment, ii. Procedure like injecting
sclerosing solution, or iii. Banding.
- n a case of haematemesis, where the cause is portal hypertension
and the bleeding does not stop with intensive medical treatment,
this procedure can be offered to the patient.
- In anaemia due to congestive gastropathy, which is going
to remain lifetime, TIPSS can be offered.
- Patients having Budd Chiari syndrome are the ideal candidates
for this procedure.
- Finally, patients of resistant ascites, especially those
awaiting liver transplant, can be offered this procedure.
Ideally, to achieve good results from this procedure, besides
a gastroenterologist, additional help of an interventional radiologist
should also be sought at the time of procedure. |
INSTRUMENTAL
DELIVERY MAKES FUTURE VAGINAL DELIVERY MORE LIKELY
Instrumental vaginal delivery is better than caesarean
section for future delivery outcomes. Three years after
the delivery, Bahl and colleagues surveyed 283 women
who had had instrumental delivery or caesarean section.
They found that subsequent spontaneous vaginal delivery
was more likely after an instrumental delivery than
after a caesarean section, that fear of childbirth was
common after all types of operative delivery, and that
difficulty conceiving was more likely after caesarean
section. Operative delivery in the second stage of labour
has important implications for future delivery outcomes,
the authors say, and its psychological impact needs
urgent attention.
BMJ,
2004; 328 : 311.
|
|