| Home
> Table of Contents
> Review Article |
| |
Relevant Cardiac Biochemical Markers
Santosh B Shinde*, Anil Tendolkar**, Neela D Patil*** |
| |
Acute coronary syndromes remain the
leading cause of mortality in India and represent an enormous
cost to the health care system. The evaluation of myocardial
damage in relation to cardiac operation, from a clinical and
a research perspective, is of great importance; particularly
for the evaluation of different cardioprotective strategies.
Cardiac biochemical markers play an important role in helping
physicians make the diagnosis and for risk stratification of
patients. Currently, amongst many cardiac markers, cardiac troponin
I seems to be the most cardiac-specific for the diagnosis of
acute myocardial infarction. This article is focused on the
application of biochemical markers for clinical purpose and
comparison of their usages in the diagnosis of acute myocardial
infarction.
|
| |
| INTRODUCTION |
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain the leading cause
of death in most of the industralized world. Myocardial
infarction (MI) as a pathologic concept was recognized
in the beginning of the 20th century. At autopsy vegetation,
due to endocarditis on the aortic valve, was found to
have blocked the orifice of the right coronary artery.2
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the
definition of acute MI includes the presence of two of
the following three criteria: 1) Characteristic chest
pain, usually of more than 30 minutes; 2) diagnostic electrocardiogram
(ECG) changes; and 3) a rise and subsequent fall of serial
levels of cardiac markers.3 Acute coronary syndromes remain
the leading cause of mortality in India and represent
an enormous cost to the health care system.4-6 Effective
intervention in acute MI is undoubtedly dependent upon
early diagnosis. In cases of massive cardiac injury, the
above criteria will be met easily. However, in the event
of occlusion of small coronary branches or extensive collateral
circulation to the ischaemic area, the typical clinical
or ECG findings may not be present.7 Thus, diagnosis based
on ECG, is a continuing challenge. The concern about missing
the diagnosis in patients with acute MI has led to a lower
threshold for admission in order to exclude the presence
of acute MI. Lee et al reported approximately 60% to 70%
of patients, with chest pain, admitted to hospital were
eventually diagnosed as not having an MI but rather some
different diagnosis.8 According to the criteria for acute
MI laid by the WHO,3 cardiac markers can facilitate the
diagnosis of an MI. Biochemical markers have long been
the cornerstone of diagnosis and continue to play an important
role, especially in the group of patients with low medium
risk. Use of biochemical markers, to diagnose acute MI,
can be dated back to 1954 when aspartate aminotransferase
(AST) was first used, which subsequently stimulated a
number of investigations on different compounds.9 Creatine
phosphokinase (CPK) replaced AST in late 1960’s
and Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was started to be used
as a late marker in 1970’s. Since the early 1980’s,
the more specific CK isoenzyme, CK-MB, has become the
“gold standard” for the diagnosis of acute
MI and additionally, in past few years, the separation
of CK-MB into two isoforms by electrophoresis (EP) has
played an important role in the development of the automated
enzyme immunoassays, which utilize highly sensitive and
specific monoclonal antibodies to detect CK-MB and cardiac
troponin.7,9 For more than 15 years cardiac form of troponin
I is known as a reliable marker of cardiac tissue injury.
It is considered to be more sensitive and significantly
more specific in diagnosis of MI than the golden markers
of last decades CK-MB, as well as myoglobin and LDH isoenzymes.
Other biochemical markers such as fatty acid binding protein,
glycogen phosphorylase, plasma oxidase and, C-reactive
protein have not been accepted widely in the diagnosis
of AMI.
Several criteria for the ideal cardiac marker are summarized
such as : The ideal cardiac marker should; 1) have sufficient
specificity for the diagnosis of myocardial damage, in
the presence of skeletal muscle injury, 2) be highly sensitive
and capable of detecting even mild myocardial damage,
3) appear in quantities that are in direct proportion
to the extent of the injury, 4) be absent or present only
in trace amounts, in the circulation, under physiological
condition, and have the possibility to be detected as
abnormal with even minimal elevation in their levels,
5) be technically easy to measure and should not be very
expensive.9,10 Currently none of the available markers
meet all these criteria. Therefore continued research
on better markers and approaches in the diagnosis of acute
coronary syndromes is needed. |
| |
| Cardiac Biochemical Markers |
Creatinine Phosphokinase (CPK) and its Isoenzyme
MB
CK has three isoforms: BB, MB and MM. The characteristics
of CK-MB are summarized in Table 1. CK (EC 2.7.3.2) is
a cytosolic enzyme that catalyses the reversible transfer
of a phosphate group from adenosine triphosphate (ATP)
to creatine. The activity of CK is dependent on the muscle
mass. CK-MM is predominant in both heart and skeletal
muscle but CK-MB is more specific for the myocardium but
is also present in tongue, diaphragm, and skeletal muscles,
although in minute amounts of only 1% to 3%.15 CK can
be elevated in multiple conditions such as hypothyroidism,
chronic renal failure, chronic alcoholism, myopathies,
following cardioversion, cerebrovascular diseases, intramuscular
injections and surgical trauma.9,1215 The specificity
of CK-MB is enhanced by the calculation of CK-MB to CK-ratio
(CK index).
The tissue CK-MB (MB2 isoform) is first released into
the circulation after myocardial injury, and serum CK-MB
(MB1 isoform) is formed as a product of CK-MB2, which
results from the action of the serum enzyme carboxypeptidase.
The proteolytic action of carboxypeptidase removes the
terminal positively charged lysine to produce a more negatively
charged CK-MB. Puleo16 studied 1110 patients with chest
pain, and showed that CK-MB isoform reliably detected
MI within the first 6 hours after the onset of symptoms
with a sensitivity of 95.7% as compared to only 48% sensitivity
of the conventional CK-MB assay. They additionally showed
a specificity of 93.9%. The ratio of MB2 to MB1 > 1.5
is indicative of myocardial cell damage. The MB2 and MB2/MB1
ratio increase within 2 hours after the onset of chest
pain, and peaks by 4-6 hours, but the sensitivity of the
ratio increase with the time interval passed between the
onset of symptoms. The sensitivity being 8% at 2 hours,
56% at 4 hours and up to 96% at 6 hours.16,17 However,
many false positive results have been observed in patients
with urinary tract infections, cholecystitis, pulmonary
oedema, congestive heart failure, urosepsis and many types
of muscle diseases.9 Although skeletal muscle damage may
result in the increase of MB2/MB1 ratio, the CK-MB index
should be less than 4.0.18 MB isoform have better sensitivity
and specificity within 6 hours of infarct. Furthermore,
increased MB2/MB1 ratio has been suggested to be associated
with acute rejection in cardiac transplant patients, and
also the ratio increased before histological changes of
rejection were seen on biopsy.19
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)
LD (EC1.1.1.27) is responsible for the interconversion
of pyruvate and lactate during glycolysis. It is localized
in the cytoplasm, and the highest activities are found
in skeletal muscle, liver, heart, kidney and red blood
cells. LD is a tetramer composed of two subunits (M or
muscle and H or Heart). The two subunits give rise to
five Isoenzymes : LD-1 (H4), LD-2 (H3M), LD-3 (H2M2),
LD-4 (HM3), LD-5 (M4).7,21 LD-1 is the predominant form
in heart but it also found in red blood cells and kidney.
LD-2 is also abundant in heart whereas LD-5 is present
predominantly in skeletal muscle. Total LD is usually
measured from serum as enzymatic activity.7 The use for
the diagnosis of acute MI is limited and its use for the
diagnosis of “late” (> 24-48 hours) MI
has been replaced by cardiac troponins.
Myoglobin
Myoglobin is a 17.8 kDa haeme protein present in the
cytosol of skeletal and cardiac muscle but not smooth
muscles. Because of its small size, Myoglobin is rapidly
released from the areas of ischaemic injury (Table 1).
It is rapidly removed from circulation, filtered through
the glomerular membrane of kidney, and excreted in the
urine.22 The early rise of Myoglobin makes it a marker
for early detection of acute MI.22,23 However, Myoglobin
is also released in other disease states, including post
open-heart surgery, skeletal muscle injury, muscular dystrophy,
renal failure, shock and trauma.22,24 Based on a small
study by Woo,22 the initial rate of Myoglobin release
demonstrates good utility for both early detection and
early exclusion of acute MI. Because of its low specificity,
proper utilization of this cardiac marker should include
the establishment of reference ranges with use of serial
determinations on serum samples. The sensitivity and specificity
is 90.1% and 74% respectively. If the repeat Myoglobin
level doubles within 1 to 2 hours after initial value,
it is highly specific for acute MI. However, consistency
of sensitivity and specificity is lacking due to several
factors summarized in Table 2. The lack of specificity
of Myoglobin hampers its utility in the diagnosis of acute
MI. Carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme III (CA III), a skeletal
muscle specific protein, might be able to improve the
specificity of myoglobin. CAIII is found to be present
in skeletal muscle but not in cardiac muscle.25,26 By
measuring the ratio of Myoglobin to CA III, the source
of Myoglobin may be ascertained; myoglobin is increased
in MI patients, whereas CAIII is not altered following
MI.27 A prospective study of 251 patients by Brogan28
showed that the use of Myoglobin to CAIII ratio was significantly
more sensitive than CK-MB, yet as specific for the early
(within 3 hours after onset of symptoms) diagnosis of
acute MI. Therefore, the use of the ratio can increase
the specificity of myoglobin in the diagnosis of AMI.
Fatty Acid-Binding Protein
Fatty acid binding protein (FABP) has a role in the uptake,
transport, and metabolism of fatty acids within cells.
Heart fatty acid binding protein (hFABP) is a cytoplasmic
form of this protein that has been studied for its potential
as a new marker of AMI. FABP resembles myoglobin with
respect to molecular weight (15 kDa), serum concentration
changes and appearance in blood, but has a slightly higher
specificity (Table 1). Recent work by Ishii et al showed
that FABP is a more sensitive and specific marker than
Myoglobin for early diagnosis of acute MI within 6 hours,
particularly within 3 hours, after the onset of chest
pain. It was reported that perioperative myocardial injury
can be diagnosed from the release of cardiac marker at
30 minutes after start of reperfusion, and FABP is a more
suitable marker than CK-MB or Myoglobin for early assessment
of postoperative myocardial infarction.29 Abe30 also suggested
that FABP is useful both in early diagnosis of acute MI,
and in discrimination of acute MI from skeletal injury.
But, one potential drawback of hFABP as a cardiac marker
is that it is not specific to the heart, being found as
well as in high levels in skeletal muscle and the kidneys
(and to a lesser extent in other tissues).
Glycogen Phosphorylase
Another potential new cardiac marker is glycogen phosphorylase
isoenzyme BB (GPBB, 96 kDa) that is the predominant isoenzyme
in human myocardium. The enzyme glycogen phosphorylase
is involved in the breakdown of glycogen. It is hypothesized
that the release of glycogen phosphorylase into the plasma
may be due to the increased glycogenolysis during an acute
MI. Mair31 showed that glycogen phosphorylase BB was significantly
increased, above the normal range, in most of the patients
with unstable angina and transient ST-T changes with the
average delay of 4.5 hours from the onset of chest pain
to admission. It is released early after AMI onset and
can be detected by immunoassays. Increased levels of GPBB
can be detected in the serum approximately one to four
hours after onset of pain, earlier than current cardiac
markers such as CK-MB, myoglobin, and troponin T or troponin
I are noted. Thus, use of GPBB as a cardiac marker offers
the potential of increased sensitivity combined with specificity
for cardiac muscle damage.
Plasma Oxidase
Polymorphonuclear leucocyte (PMN) derived oxyradicals
have been known to be important in the tissue injury associated
with acute MI, and oxidase is released from PMN’s
at the onset of myocardial injury. Lasala32 studied 58
patients in which 50 patients with possible acute MI were
admitted to cardiac care unit (CCU) for monitoring compared
to 8 patients with pneumonia whose leucocyte counts were
greater than 15,000. In addition, 12 healthy volunteers
served as controls. In preliminary study, the plasma oxidase
activity (POA) was found to be diagnostic for acute MI
with sensitivity of 95% while the sensitivity of the corresponding
CK-MB was only 54%. However, the POA values were also
found to be high in pneumonia patients. The mean time
from the onset of chest pain to blood sampling was 3.1
hours, and the POA levels remained elevated longer than
that of CK-MB.
Troponins
The troponin complex regulates the calcium-dependent
interaction of myosin with actin in muscle contraction.
It consists of three subunits, TnT, TnI, and troponin
C (TnC), which are located on the thin filament of the
contracile apparatus. TnT anchors the troponin complex
to tropomyosin, TnC binds calcium ions and initiates the
contractile response, and TnI inhibits actin-myosin cross-linking
as shown in Fig. 1.
Separate genes code for the cardiac muscle, fast skeletal
muscle and slow skeletal muscle isoforms of TnT and TnI.33
Thus, cardiac TnT and TnI have unique amino acid sequences
that bind to specific monoclonal antibodies.34 On the
other hand,identical TnC is expressed in cardiac and slow
skeletal muscle in addition to a divergent fast skeletal
muscle isoform, which prevents its use in the detection
of myocardial injury.34 The regulatory troponin complex
does not exist in smooth muscle.33
Troponin T
TnT is the tropomyosin binding subunit located on the
thin myofilament of the contractile apparatus. In most
patients cTnT release was biphasic.35 Some reports have
claimed that cTnT has higher sensitivity and negative
predictive value in detecting MI than conventionally measured
cardiac enzymes.36-38 In contrast to cTnI, cTnT is not
totally cardiac specific.32 It is expressed in regenerating
muscle as well as in normal skeletal muscle33 and its
level increases, in the absence of evidence of myocardial
involvement, in patients with polymyositis.34 cTnT is
also elevated in confirmed myocarditis, pericarditis and
heart contusion following blunt heart trauma.27,29 Moreover,
spurious rises in cTnT concentration have been reported
in patients with diverse underlying clinical condition
such as polymyositis, rhabdomyolysis, chronic muscle disease,
and renal failure.39-46
Katus et al47 introduced in 1989 a specific enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method using two monoclonal
antibodies for the detection of cardiac TnT in serum.
In the ‘first-generation’ TnT assay only the
capture antibody was completely cardiac-specific. However,
the detection antibody was only 78% cardiac-specific.48
This assay had about 1-2% cross-reactivity with skeletal
muscle TnT.49 The cross-reactivity was found to be immunologic
and resulting from unspecific absorption of purified skeletal
TnT to the test tubes.49 The unspecific signal-antibody
then detected these molecules. Thus, the ‘first-generation’
test could give false-positive results also in patients
with severe skeletal muscle injury. The first assays of
‘premarket generation’ had cut-off values
as high as 0.5 µg/l.49 The cut-off values for the
actual ‘first-generation’ TnT assays were
0.2 µg/l in the earliest studies and 0.1 µg/l
in subsequent studies.50
Troponin I
c TnI is a smaller protein with molecular weight of 22.5
kDa. High troponin concentrations persist for at least
5 days, despite its biological half-life of 120 minutes,
reflecting a continuing release of this protein from disintegrating
myofilaments.51 Cardiac TnI is present in the circulation
in three forms: free, as a TnI-TnC complex, and as TnT-TnI-TnC
complex.52 Actually, the predominant part of TnI circulates
in the form of a complex.53 Furthermore; these three forms
circulate in different degrees of proteolytic degradation.52,54
Katrukha et al showed that in necrotic human cardiac tissues
and in serum of MI patients, the amino-and carboxy-terminal
regions of cardiac TnI are vulnerable to degradation.54
The most stable region was found to be located between
amino acid residues 30 and 110, possibly due to its protection
by TnC.54 In another study by Shi et al55 the amino terminal
region of cardiac TnI molecule was found to be more stable
than the carboxyterminal region. These findings are important
in explaining the wide variation of values measured with
different TnI assays. Some assays has also been reported
to be interfered by rheumatoid factor and heterophilic
antibodies, which may lead to false increase of TnI.56-58
Human studies have demonstrated the absence of elevated
levels of TnI in a variety of clinical conditions such1,9,48-52
as after endurance exercises, skeletal muscle injury,
rhabdomyolysis, chronic myopathy, cocaine induced chest
pain, hypothyroidism, non-cardiac surgery, and chronic
renal failure.
cTnI was proposed to be a gold standard for diagnosis
of acute MI. Table 3 and measurement of cTnI would help
clarify the diagnosis in patients with concomitant myocardial
and skeletal muscle injury.59,60 |
| |
| Comparison of Cardiac Markers in Diagnosis of
Acute MI |
A small prospective study was performed by Mair61 in
order to compare the early sensitivities of myoglobin,
CK-MB, Ck-isoform ratios, cTnT and cTnI for acute MI.
37 consecutive patients with acute MI, who were admitted
to the CCU within 4 hours after chest pain, were studied.
All tested markers had low sensitivity within the 1st
3 hours; and they did not reach 100% sensitivity before
6 to 10 hours after the onset of chest pain. Actually
the choice of cardiac marker should be based on the specificity
of markers. Subsequently, Pervaiz55 compared cTnI and
CK-MB in the diagnosis of AMI in a larger study of 291
patients. They demonstrated that cTnI has higher sensitivity,
specificity as well as a wider diagnostic window than
CK-MB for diagnosis of acute MI.
Javier de Castro Martinez62 performed a prospective study
of 64 patients undergoing CABG. They successfully showed
that cTnI had the highest sensitivity of 90.9% and CK-MB
had the lowest sensitivity of 72.2% respectively. Hence
the authors concluded that cardiac TnI elevation appeared
to be an early specific marker for the diagnosis of perioperative
MI after CABG.
Kost63 performed a prospective study of 97 patients to
compare the use of CK-MB mass, CK-MB isoforms, myoglobin,
cTnT and cTnI in the diagnosis of AMI. They successfully
showed that cTnI had the highest specificity (100%) and
the highest positive predictive value (100%). cTnI, cTnT
and CK-MB had the highest sensitivity (90%) and the negative
predictive values of cTnI, cTnT and CK-MB were 97.8%,
97.6% and 97.6% respectively. CK-MB isoforms had the lowest
sensitivity (70%) and myoglobin had the lowest specificity
(75%). The author favoured cTnI due to its high positive
predictive value and specificity.
S Ben Ayed64 performed a prospective study of 11 patients,
to assess the specificity of biochemical markers, including
cTnT and cTnI, during abdominal aortic surgery in a control
group of patients without postoperative myocardial infarction.
They demonstrated that specificity of myoglobin, CK-MB,
cTnI and cTnT was 93%, 92%, 100% and 100% respectively.
These authors favoured cTnT and cTnI as highly specific
markers for the exclusion of post operative MI in comparison
to CK-MB.
Neumayr65 performed a retrospective study of 110 patients
admitted to the emergency department for the evaluation
of a traumatic chest pain. They demonstrated that cTnI
alone had a sensitivity of 90.2%, a specificity of 95.7%,
a positive predictive value of 92.5% and a negative predictive
value of 94.3%. The combination of CK-Mb and cTnI provided
much higher sensitivity (100%) and a much higher negative
predictive value (100%), which is particularly important
to exclude the diagnosis of acute MI. All these prove
that troponins are highly cardiospecific markers.
Troponin T versus I
A few studies have compared troponin T and I directly
to each other. Their sensitivities in the diagnosis of
myocardial infarction and minor myocardial damage are
clinically equal. Troponin I appears to be more specific
than T.66 Both give equal prognostic information.68-71
The choice of which marker to be used is institution specific.
Emergency physicians should feel confident in the support
provided to risk stratification from either assay, and
should focus on clinically important turn-around times
instead of which test is run. |
| |
| Troponin T and Troponin I : Advantages and Disadvantages |
TnI is a biochemical marker of myocardial injury with
a high degree of cardiospecificity. The diagnostic specificity
of TnT is lower than that of TnI (92%). This is due to
the re-expression of TnT during regeneration and degenerative
changes in skeletal muscles. Individual genes encode troponins,
but at the level of RNA transcription, one particular
gene can give rise to a variety of isoforms owing to the
mechanism of alternative splicing. In the skeletal muscles,
15 isoforms of TnT, 2 isoforms of cTnI and 2 isoforms
of TnC have been detected. In the human myocardium, 2
isoforms of TnT and 1 isoforms of TnI have been isolated.
A myocardium form of TnC has not been found.
TnI is absent in the myocardium and skeletal muscles
during embryogenesis and foetogenesis. The synthesis of
TnI in the myocardium begins postnatally. On the other
hand, the synthesis of both isoforms of TnT (TnT1 and
TnT2) is induced during the foetal development of both
the myocardium and the skeletal muscles. In adult skeletal
muscles, TnT is either absent or present only in minute
quantities during degeneration and regeneration.
The different methods for assessment of TnI represent
the major disadvantages of its clinical use. There are
a variety of kits manufactured by different manufacturers.
They usually use a system of two antibodies targeted against
distinct epitopes. Thus, the tests differ in their analytical
sensitivity as well as in detection limits.
In comparison to TnI, the diagnostic parameters of TnT
are identical worldwide. It has also been possible to
set up a database of clinically verified data.
It is interesting to note that in literature, describing
the role, usefulness, and limitations of various biochemical
markers, there is considerable variation with regards
to reports of their sensitivity and specificity. This
may be attributed to varying reference ranges adopted
and the consequent categorization of normal and abnormal. |
| |
| Conclusions |
| Cardiac troponins, especially cTnI, are the test of choice
for the diagnosis of AMI given its high sensitivity and
superior specificity. In addition multiple applications
and testing protocols of cardiac markers have been proposed
and applied clinically. |
| |
| Acknowledgement |
| The authors wish to thank the Dean, Dr. ME Yeolekar, for
granting us permission to publish this report. |
| |
| References |
| 1. |
Fleming PR. Ischaemic heart disease:
prelude to an epidemic. In : A short history of cardiology.
Amsterdam : Editions Rodopi BV, 1997; 167-79. |
| 2. |
Hammer A. Ein fall Von thrombotischem
Verschlusse einer der Kranzarterien des Herzens. Z
Klin Med 1910; 71 : 116-32. Quoted by fleming PR.
Ischaemic heart disease: prelude to and epidemic In:
a short history of cardiology. Amsterdam: Edition
Rodopi BV, 1997; 167-79. |
| 3. |
Keffer JH. Myocardial markers of injury.
Evolution and insights. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;
105 : 305-20. |
| 4. |
Padmavati S. A five-year survey of
heart disease in Delhi. Ind Heart J 1958;
10 : 35. |
| 5. |
hatakia KU. Incidence and etiology
of coronary artery disease. J Asso Phys Ind 1964;
14 : 283. |
| 6. |
Naik BK. Incidence of coronary heart
disease and cardiovascular disease in Hyderabad.
Ind Heart J 1986; 18 : 357. |
| 7. |
Adams JE, Jaffe AS. Biochemical markers
of myocardial injury. Is MB creatine kinase the choice
for the 1990s? Circulation 1993; 88 : 750-63. |
| 8. |
Lee TH. Ruling out acute myocardial
infarction. A prospective multicentre validation of
12-hour strategy for patients at low risk. N Eng
J Med 1991; 324 : 1239-46. |
| 9. |
Mercer DW. A historical background
in cardiac markers. Medical Laboratory Observer
1996; 45-51 |
| 10. |
Char DM. Early laboratory indicators
of acute myocardial infarction. Emerg Med Clinics
North Am 1998; 16 : 519-39. |
| 11. |
Galvani M, Ferrini D. New markers of
early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.
Int J Cardiol 1998; 65 : S17-22. |
| 12. |
Adams JE III, Abendschein DR, Jaffe
AS. Biochemical markers of myocardial injury. Is MB
creatine kinase the choice for the 1990s? Circulation
1993; 88 : 750-63. |
| 13. |
Donnelly R, Millar Craig MW. Cardiac
troponins: IT upgrade for the heart. Lancet 1998;
351 : 537-39. |
| 14. |
Apple FS. Cardiac function. In: Burtis
Cam ashwood ER eds. Tietz fundamentals of clinical
chemistry. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company 2001;
682-97. |
| 15. |
Char DM, Israel E, Landenson J. Early
laboratory indicators of acute myocardial infarction.
Emerg Med Clinics North Am 1998; 16 : 519-39. |
| 16. |
Puleo PR, Meyer D. Use of a rapid assay
of subform of creatine kinase MB to diagnose or rule
out acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med
1994; 331 : 561-66. |
| 17. |
Puleo PR. Noninvasive detection of
reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction based on
plasma activity of creatine kinase MB isoforms. J
Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17 : 1047-52. |
| 18. |
Wong SS. Strategic utilization of cardiac
markers for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.
Ann Clin Lab Sci 1996; 26 : 310-12. |
| 19. |
Hossein-Nia M, Mascaro J. Troponin
T as a non-invasive marker of cardiac allograft rejection.
i 1993; 341 : 838. |
| 20. |
Lott JA, Heinz JW. Time change of creatine
kinase and creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme versus discrimination
values in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction;
what is the optimal method for displaying the data?
Eur J Clin Chem Biochem 1995; 33 : 491-96. |
| 21. |
Henderson AR, Moss DW. Enzymes. In:
Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, eds. Tietz fundamentals of
clinical chemistry. 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders
Company, 2001; 352-89. |
| 22 |
Woo J, Lacbawan FL, et al. Is Myoglobin
useful in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction
in the emergency department setting? Am J Clin
Pathol 1995; 103 : 725-29. |
| 23. |
De winter RJ, Koster RW. Value of Myoglobin
troponin T and CK-MB mass in ruling out an acute myocardial
infarction in the emergency room. Circulation
1995; 92 : 3401-7. |
| 24. |
Robberts R. Myoglobinemia as an index
to myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med
1977; 87 : 788-98. |
| 25 |
Kato K, Mokuno K. Distribution of immunoreactive
carbonic anhydrase III in various tissues determined
by a sensitive enzyme immunoassay method. Clin
Chim Acta 1984; 141 : 169-77. |
| 26. |
Caulfield JB, Bittner V. Cardiac matrix
alternation induced by Adriamycin. Am J Pathol
1988; 133 : 298-305. |
| 27. |
Vaananen HK. Serum carbonic anhydrase
III and Myoglobin concentration in acute MI. Clin
Chem 1990; 36 : 635-38. |
| 28. |
Ishii J, wang JH. Serum concentration
of Myoglobin vs human heart type cytoplasmic fatty
acid binding protein in early detection of acute MI.
Clin Chem 1997; 43 : 1372-78. |
| 29. |
Fransen EJ, Masessen JG. Demonstration
of ischemia-reperfusion injury separate from postoperative
infarction in coronary artery bypass graft patients.
Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65 : 48-53. |
| 30. |
Abe S, Saigo M. Heart fatty acid-binding
protein is useful in early and myocardial specific
diagnosis of acute MI. Circulation 1996;
94 : 321-23. |
| 31. |
Mair J, Smidt J. Early relese of glycogen
phosphorylase in patients with unstable angina and
transient ST-T alterations. Br Heart J 1994;
72 : 125-27. |
| 32 |
Lasala GP, Wright T. Plasma oxidase
for screening of myocardial infarction. Am J Med
Sci 1994; 308 (3) : 157-61. |
| 33. |
Katus HA, Scheffold T. Proteins of
the troponin complex. Lab Med 1992; 23 :
311-17. |
| 34. |
Hamm CW, Katus HA. New biochemical
markers for myocardial cell injury. Curr Opin
Cardiol 1995; 10 : 355-60. |
| 35. |
Yasul B. The role of the sulfhydryl
group of tropomyosin and troponin in the calcium control
of actomyosin contractility. J Biol Chem
1968; 25 : 735-42. |
| 36 |
Katus HA, Neumann FJ. Diagnostic efficiency
of troponin T measurement in acute myocardial infarction.Circulation
1991; 83 : 902-12. |
| 37. |
Antman EM, Sacks DB. Detection of unsuspected
myocardial necrosis by rapid besides assay for cardiac
troponin T. Am Heart J 1997; 133 : 596-98. |
| 38. |
Fitzgerald RL, Frankel WL. Comparison
of troponin T with cardiac markers in a VA hospital.
Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 106 ; 396-401. |
| 39. |
Kobayashi S, Tanaka M. Serum cardiac
troponin T in polymyositis/dermatomyositis. Lancet
1992; 726. |
| 40. |
Mahalingam M. A case against the specificity
of cardiac troponin-T. J Clin Pathol 1996;
449 : 766-7. |
| 41. |
Croitore M. Spurious rises in troponin
T in end-stage renal disease. Lancet 1995;
346 : 974. |
| 42. |
Frankel WL, Herold DA. Cardiac troponin
T is elevated in asymptomatic patients with chronic
renal failure. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 106
: 118-23. |
| 43. |
Braun SL, Baum H. Troponin T and troponin
I after coronary artery bypass grafting: Discordant
results in patients with renal failure. Clin Chem
1996; 42 : 781-83. |
| 44. |
Lofberg M, Tahtela R. Cardiac troponins
in severe rhabdomyolysis. Clin Chem 1996;
42 : 1120-21. |
| 45. |
Li D, Jialal I. Greater frequency of
increased cardiac troponin T then increased cardiac
troponin I in patients with chronic renal failure.
Clin Chem 1996; 42 : 114-5. |
| 46. |
Mclaurin MD, Apple FS. Cardiac troponin
I, cardiac troponin T and creatine kinase MB in dialysis
patients without ischemic heart disease: evidence
of cardiac troponin T expression in skeletal muscle.
Clin Chem 1997; 43 : 976-82. |
| 47. |
Katus HA, Remppis A. Enzyme linked
immunoassay of cardiac troponin T for detection of
acute myocardial infarction in patients. J Mol
Cell Cardiol 1989; 21 : 1349-53. |
| 48. |
Collinson PO, Boa FG. Measurement of
cardiac troponin. Ann Clin Biochem 2001;
38 : 423-49. |
| 49. |
Katus HA, Remppis A. Diagnostic efficiency
of troponin T measurement in acute myocardial infarction.
Circulation 1991; 83 : 902-12. |
| 50. |
Muller-Bardorff M, Hallermayer K, Schroder
A. Improved troponin T ELISA specific for cardiac
troponin T isoform: assay development and analytical
and clinical validation. Clin Chem 1997;
43 : 458-66. |
| 51. |
Coundrey L. The troponins. Arch
Intern Med 1998; 158 : 1173-80. |
| 52. |
Apple FS. Cardiac function. In: Burtis
CA, Ashwood ER, eds, Tiez fundamentals of clinical
chemistry. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company
2001; 682-97. |
| 53. |
Katrukha AG, Bereznikova AV, Esakova
TV. Troponin I is released in bloodstream of patients
with acute myocardial infarction not in free form
but as complex. Clin Chem 1997; 43 : 1349-85. |
| 54. |
Shi Q, Ling M, Zhang X. Degradation
of cardiac troponin I in serum complicates comparisons
of cardiac troponin I assays. Clin Chem 1999;
45 : 1018-25. |
| 55. |
Dasgupta A, Banerjee SK, Datta P. False-positive
troponin I in the MEIA due to the presence of rheumatoid
factors in serum. Elimination of this interference
by using polyclonal antisera against rheumatoid factors.
Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 112 : 753-56. |
| 56. |
Fitzmaurice TF, Brown C, Rifai N, Wu
AH, Yeo KT. False increase of cardiac troponin I with
heterophilic antibodies. Clin Chem 1998;
44 : 2212-14. |
| 57. |
Onuska KD, Hill SA. Effect of rheumatoid
factor on cardiac troponin I measurement using two
commercial measurement systems. Clin Chem
2000; 46 : 307-8. |
| 58. |
Wu AH, Feng YJ, Moore R. Characterization
of cardiac troponin subunit release into serum after
acute myocardial infarction and comparison of assays
for troponin T and I. Clin Chem 1998; 44
: 1198-1208. |
| 59. |
Guest TM, Tuteur PG. JAMA
1995; 274 : 1672-73. |
| 60. |
Keffer JH. The cardiac profile and
proposed practice guideline for acute ischemic heart
diseases. Am J Clin Pathol 1997; 107 : 398-409. |
| 61. |
Mair J, Morandell D. Equivalent early
sensitivities of myoglobin, creatine kinase MB mass,
creatine kinase isoform ratios, and cardiac troponin
T and I for acute myocardial infarction. Clin
Chem 1995; 41 : 1266-72 |
| 62. |
Javier de castro Martinez. Cardiac
Troponin I in perioperative myocardial infarction
after coronary artery bypass surgery. Rev Esp
Cardiol 2002; 55 (3) : 245-50. |
| 63. |
Kost. Compare the use of CK-MB mass,
CK-Mb isoforms, myoglobin, cTnT and cTnI in the diagnosis
of MI. Ann Clin Biochem 2001; 55 : 242. |
| 64. |
yed S Ben, Godet G. Specificity of
cardiac markers troponin I and T in excluding postoperative
myocardial infarction. Ann Clin Biochem 1997;
34 : 559-60. |
| 65. |
Neumayr G. Plasma levels of cardiac
troponin I after prolonged strenuous endurance exercise.
Am J Cardiol 2001; 87 : 369-71, A10. |
| 66. |
Tucker JF, Collins RA, Anderson AJ,
Hauser J, Kalas J, Apple FS. Early diagnostic efficiency
of cardiac troponin I and troponin T for acute myocardial
infarction. Acad Emerg Med 1997; 4 : 13-21. |
| 67. |
Hetland O, Dickstein K. Cardiac troponins
I and T in patients with suspected acute coronary
syndrome: a comparative study in a routine setting.
Clin Chem 1998; 44 : 1430-6. |
| 68. |
Luscher MS, Thygesen K, Ravkilde J,
Heickendorff L. Applicability of cardiac troponin
T and I for early risk stratification in unstable
coronary artery disease. Circulation 1997;
96 : 2578-85. |
| 69. |
Tanaka H, Abe S, Yamashita T. Serum
levels of cardiac troponin I and troponin T in estimating
myocardial infarct size soon after reperfusion. Coron
Artery Dis 1997; 8 : 433-9 |
| 70. |
Curzen NP, Patel DJ, Kemp M, et al.
Can C reactive protein or troponins T and I predict
outcome in patients with intractable unstable angina?
Heart 1998; 80 : 23-7. |
| 71. |
Wu AHB. Biochemical markers of cardiac
damage: from traditional enzymes to cardiac-specific
proteins. Scand J Clin Invest 1999; 59 (Suppl
230) : 74-82. |
|
MY LOUSY DOCTOR
My senior attending physician recently told me,
"A physician who treats himself, has got
a lousy doctor." This he said while being
hospitalised just a few days after having a myocardial
infarction. Feeling an uncontrolled severe reflux
for two days, he had finally recorded an electrocardiogram
"just in case". Seeing the inferior
wall Q waves and remnant ST segment elevations,
he still waited to show the electrocardiogram
to a cardiologist, who eventually made him go
to the emergency room.
Shortly after, on an unforgettable evening, I
suddenly felt the worst abdominal pain I have
ever had in my life. I knew, palpating my lower
abdomen, that severe tenderness, rebound, and
guarding are not good prognostic signs, but I
ignored them and hoped everything would disappear
by morning.
It didn't I had mild fever the next day, and
the pain subsided, but when, on the third day,
my temperature rose I had to reconsider my situation.
I thought that, although it is quite shameful
for an internist (newly certified, mind you) to
show up in the emergency department with a case
of acute gastroenteritis, perhaps a surgical consultation
would be appropriate. After receiving two litres
of intravenous normal saline, I persuaded the
surgeon that it might truly be a case of acute
gastroenteritis. I decided myself to take a short
course of antibiotics, and felt better. I even
went back to work. I stopped the antibiotics after
three days of treatment, because three days are
enough.
That evening I felt much worse. The next day,
I couldn't drag myself home, and the fever returned.
We (that is, my wife) decided to pay another (reluctant)
visit to the emergency room. The on-call resident
diagnosed colitis. By now, I was running up and
down the differential diagnosis, but could conclude
nothing. It was 3 am, and luckily the surgeon
decided to hospitalise me; so I was now forced
to stop diagnosing and treating myself.
After data revision, the "colitis"
turned to be acute diverticulitis with a small
pericolonic abscess. Yes, this disease is known
to occur most commonly in elderly people, and,
sure enough, when my good hearted colleagues came
to visit they had plenty of jokes at my expense.
One warned me of my next hospitalisation due to
catheter, related urosepsis, and another asked
for my "do not resuscitate" status and
transfer to a long term facility. I had to stay
in hospital for six days of intravenous antibiotics
(and jokes).
These were surely the worst two weeks in my life.
Can you imagine the daily "Do nots"
from my wife? And being preached to by both my
mother and mother in law? Pain and fever paled
into insignificance compared with having to listen
to my mother, every day, repeating, "A doctor
must not take care of himself", and with
my mother in law reminding me "You must rest"
again and again.
I am now much better and back at work. In a month
or so, I will have to experience the wonders of
the gastroenterological evaluation, this time
not as a doctor. Thus, my mother and mother in
law were correct (I can't believe I just wrote
that); so was my senior attending physician, although
realising it a little late (I wonder if his mother
preached to him too): "A physician who treats
himself has got a lousy doctor".
Moshe E Gatt, BMJ, 2004; 328 : 219.
|
|
|
|