Bombay Hospital Journal ContentsHomeArchivesSearchBooksFeedback


Home > Table of Contents > Review Article
 

Relevant Cardiac Biochemical Markers

Santosh B Shinde*, Anil Tendolkar**, Neela D Patil***

 

Acute coronary syndromes remain the leading cause of mortality in India and represent an enormous cost to the health care system. The evaluation of myocardial damage in relation to cardiac operation, from a clinical and a research perspective, is of great importance; particularly for the evaluation of different cardioprotective strategies. Cardiac biochemical markers play an important role in helping physicians make the diagnosis and for risk stratification of patients. Currently, amongst many cardiac markers, cardiac troponin I seems to be the most cardiac-specific for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. This article is focused on the application of biochemical markers for clinical purpose and comparison of their usages in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.

 
INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain the leading cause of death in most of the industralized world. Myocardial infarction (MI) as a pathologic concept was recognized in the beginning of the 20th century. At autopsy vegetation, due to endocarditis on the aortic valve, was found to have blocked the orifice of the right coronary artery.2 According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the definition of acute MI includes the presence of two of the following three criteria: 1) Characteristic chest pain, usually of more than 30 minutes; 2) diagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG) changes; and 3) a rise and subsequent fall of serial levels of cardiac markers.3 Acute coronary syndromes remain the leading cause of mortality in India and represent an enormous cost to the health care system.4-6 Effective intervention in acute MI is undoubtedly dependent upon early diagnosis. In cases of massive cardiac injury, the above criteria will be met easily. However, in the event of occlusion of small coronary branches or extensive collateral circulation to the ischaemic area, the typical clinical or ECG findings may not be present.7 Thus, diagnosis based on ECG, is a continuing challenge. The concern about missing the diagnosis in patients with acute MI has led to a lower threshold for admission in order to exclude the presence of acute MI. Lee et al reported approximately 60% to 70% of patients, with chest pain, admitted to hospital were eventually diagnosed as not having an MI but rather some different diagnosis.8 According to the criteria for acute MI laid by the WHO,3 cardiac markers can facilitate the diagnosis of an MI. Biochemical markers have long been the cornerstone of diagnosis and continue to play an important role, especially in the group of patients with low medium risk. Use of biochemical markers, to diagnose acute MI, can be dated back to 1954 when aspartate aminotransferase (AST) was first used, which subsequently stimulated a number of investigations on different compounds.9 Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) replaced AST in late 1960’s and Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was started to be used as a late marker in 1970’s. Since the early 1980’s, the more specific CK isoenzyme, CK-MB, has become the “gold standard” for the diagnosis of acute MI and additionally, in past few years, the separation of CK-MB into two isoforms by electrophoresis (EP) has played an important role in the development of the automated enzyme immunoassays, which utilize highly sensitive and specific monoclonal antibodies to detect CK-MB and cardiac troponin.7,9 For more than 15 years cardiac form of troponin I is known as a reliable marker of cardiac tissue injury. It is considered to be more sensitive and significantly more specific in diagnosis of MI than the golden markers of last decades CK-MB, as well as myoglobin and LDH isoenzymes. Other biochemical markers such as fatty acid binding protein, glycogen phosphorylase, plasma oxidase and, C-reactive protein have not been accepted widely in the diagnosis of AMI.

Several criteria for the ideal cardiac marker are summarized such as : The ideal cardiac marker should; 1) have sufficient specificity for the diagnosis of myocardial damage, in the presence of skeletal muscle injury, 2) be highly sensitive and capable of detecting even mild myocardial damage, 3) appear in quantities that are in direct proportion to the extent of the injury, 4) be absent or present only in trace amounts, in the circulation, under physiological condition, and have the possibility to be detected as abnormal with even minimal elevation in their levels, 5) be technically easy to measure and should not be very expensive.9,10 Currently none of the available markers meet all these criteria. Therefore continued research on better markers and approaches in the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes is needed.

 
Cardiac Biochemical Markers

Creatinine Phosphokinase (CPK) and its Isoenzyme MB

CK has three isoforms: BB, MB and MM. The characteristics of CK-MB are summarized in Table 1. CK (EC 2.7.3.2) is a cytosolic enzyme that catalyses the reversible transfer of a phosphate group from adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to creatine. The activity of CK is dependent on the muscle mass. CK-MM is predominant in both heart and skeletal muscle but CK-MB is more specific for the myocardium but is also present in tongue, diaphragm, and skeletal muscles, although in minute amounts of only 1% to 3%.15 CK can be elevated in multiple conditions such as hypothyroidism, chronic renal failure, chronic alcoholism, myopathies, following cardioversion, cerebrovascular diseases, intramuscular injections and surgical trauma.9,1215 The specificity of CK-MB is enhanced by the calculation of CK-MB to CK-ratio (CK index).

The tissue CK-MB (MB2 isoform) is first released into the circulation after myocardial injury, and serum CK-MB (MB1 isoform) is formed as a product of CK-MB2, which results from the action of the serum enzyme carboxypeptidase. The proteolytic action of carboxypeptidase removes the terminal positively charged lysine to produce a more negatively charged CK-MB. Puleo16 studied 1110 patients with chest pain, and showed that CK-MB isoform reliably detected MI within the first 6 hours after the onset of symptoms with a sensitivity of 95.7% as compared to only 48% sensitivity of the conventional CK-MB assay. They additionally showed a specificity of 93.9%. The ratio of MB2 to MB1 > 1.5 is indicative of myocardial cell damage. The MB2 and MB2/MB1 ratio increase within 2 hours after the onset of chest pain, and peaks by 4-6 hours, but the sensitivity of the ratio increase with the time interval passed between the onset of symptoms. The sensitivity being 8% at 2 hours, 56% at 4 hours and up to 96% at 6 hours.16,17 However, many false positive results have been observed in patients with urinary tract infections, cholecystitis, pulmonary oedema, congestive heart failure, urosepsis and many types of muscle diseases.9 Although skeletal muscle damage may result in the increase of MB2/MB1 ratio, the CK-MB index should be less than 4.0.18 MB isoform have better sensitivity and specificity within 6 hours of infarct. Furthermore, increased MB2/MB1 ratio has been suggested to be associated with acute rejection in cardiac transplant patients, and also the ratio increased before histological changes of rejection were seen on biopsy.19

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)

LD (EC1.1.1.27) is responsible for the interconversion of pyruvate and lactate during glycolysis. It is localized in the cytoplasm, and the highest activities are found in skeletal muscle, liver, heart, kidney and red blood cells. LD is a tetramer composed of two subunits (M or muscle and H or Heart). The two subunits give rise to five Isoenzymes : LD-1 (H4), LD-2 (H3M), LD-3 (H2M2), LD-4 (HM3), LD-5 (M4).7,21 LD-1 is the predominant form in heart but it also found in red blood cells and kidney. LD-2 is also abundant in heart whereas LD-5 is present predominantly in skeletal muscle. Total LD is usually measured from serum as enzymatic activity.7 The use for the diagnosis of acute MI is limited and its use for the diagnosis of “late” (> 24-48 hours) MI has been replaced by cardiac troponins.

Myoglobin

Myoglobin is a 17.8 kDa haeme protein present in the cytosol of skeletal and cardiac muscle but not smooth muscles. Because of its small size, Myoglobin is rapidly released from the areas of ischaemic injury (Table 1). It is rapidly removed from circulation, filtered through the glomerular membrane of kidney, and excreted in the urine.22 The early rise of Myoglobin makes it a marker for early detection of acute MI.22,23 However, Myoglobin is also released in other disease states, including post open-heart surgery, skeletal muscle injury, muscular dystrophy, renal failure, shock and trauma.22,24 Based on a small study by Woo,22 the initial rate of Myoglobin release demonstrates good utility for both early detection and early exclusion of acute MI. Because of its low specificity, proper utilization of this cardiac marker should include the establishment of reference ranges with use of serial determinations on serum samples. The sensitivity and specificity is 90.1% and 74% respectively. If the repeat Myoglobin level doubles within 1 to 2 hours after initial value, it is highly specific for acute MI. However, consistency of sensitivity and specificity is lacking due to several factors summarized in Table 2. The lack of specificity of Myoglobin hampers its utility in the diagnosis of acute MI. Carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme III (CA III), a skeletal muscle specific protein, might be able to improve the specificity of myoglobin. CAIII is found to be present in skeletal muscle but not in cardiac muscle.25,26 By measuring the ratio of Myoglobin to CA III, the source of Myoglobin may be ascertained; myoglobin is increased in MI patients, whereas CAIII is not altered following MI.27 A prospective study of 251 patients by Brogan28 showed that the use of Myoglobin to CAIII ratio was significantly more sensitive than CK-MB, yet as specific for the early (within 3 hours after onset of symptoms) diagnosis of acute MI. Therefore, the use of the ratio can increase the specificity of myoglobin in the diagnosis of AMI.

Fatty Acid-Binding Protein

Fatty acid binding protein (FABP) has a role in the uptake, transport, and metabolism of fatty acids within cells. Heart fatty acid binding protein (hFABP) is a cytoplasmic form of this protein that has been studied for its potential as a new marker of AMI. FABP resembles myoglobin with respect to molecular weight (15 kDa), serum concentration changes and appearance in blood, but has a slightly higher specificity (Table 1). Recent work by Ishii et al showed that FABP is a more sensitive and specific marker than Myoglobin for early diagnosis of acute MI within 6 hours, particularly within 3 hours, after the onset of chest pain. It was reported that perioperative myocardial injury can be diagnosed from the release of cardiac marker at 30 minutes after start of reperfusion, and FABP is a more suitable marker than CK-MB or Myoglobin for early assessment of postoperative myocardial infarction.29 Abe30 also suggested that FABP is useful both in early diagnosis of acute MI, and in discrimination of acute MI from skeletal injury.

But, one potential drawback of hFABP as a cardiac marker is that it is not specific to the heart, being found as well as in high levels in skeletal muscle and the kidneys (and to a lesser extent in other tissues).

Glycogen Phosphorylase

Another potential new cardiac marker is glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB (GPBB, 96 kDa) that is the predominant isoenzyme in human myocardium. The enzyme glycogen phosphorylase is involved in the breakdown of glycogen. It is hypothesized that the release of glycogen phosphorylase into the plasma may be due to the increased glycogenolysis during an acute MI. Mair31 showed that glycogen phosphorylase BB was significantly increased, above the normal range, in most of the patients with unstable angina and transient ST-T changes with the average delay of 4.5 hours from the onset of chest pain to admission. It is released early after AMI onset and can be detected by immunoassays. Increased levels of GPBB can be detected in the serum approximately one to four hours after onset of pain, earlier than current cardiac markers such as CK-MB, myoglobin, and troponin T or troponin I are noted. Thus, use of GPBB as a cardiac marker offers the potential of increased sensitivity combined with specificity for cardiac muscle damage.

Plasma Oxidase

Polymorphonuclear leucocyte (PMN) derived oxyradicals have been known to be important in the tissue injury associated with acute MI, and oxidase is released from PMN’s at the onset of myocardial injury. Lasala32 studied 58 patients in which 50 patients with possible acute MI were admitted to cardiac care unit (CCU) for monitoring compared to 8 patients with pneumonia whose leucocyte counts were greater than 15,000. In addition, 12 healthy volunteers served as controls. In preliminary study, the plasma oxidase activity (POA) was found to be diagnostic for acute MI with sensitivity of 95% while the sensitivity of the corresponding CK-MB was only 54%. However, the POA values were also found to be high in pneumonia patients. The mean time from the onset of chest pain to blood sampling was 3.1 hours, and the POA levels remained elevated longer than that of CK-MB.

Troponins

The troponin complex regulates the calcium-dependent interaction of myosin with actin in muscle contraction. It consists of three subunits, TnT, TnI, and troponin C (TnC), which are located on the thin filament of the contracile apparatus. TnT anchors the troponin complex to tropomyosin, TnC binds calcium ions and initiates the contractile response, and TnI inhibits actin-myosin cross-linking as shown in Fig. 1.

Separate genes code for the cardiac muscle, fast skeletal muscle and slow skeletal muscle isoforms of TnT and TnI.33 Thus, cardiac TnT and TnI have unique amino acid sequences that bind to specific monoclonal antibodies.34 On the other hand,identical TnC is expressed in cardiac and slow skeletal muscle in addition to a divergent fast skeletal muscle isoform, which prevents its use in the detection of myocardial injury.34 The regulatory troponin complex does not exist in smooth muscle.33

Troponin T

TnT is the tropomyosin binding subunit located on the thin myofilament of the contractile apparatus. In most patients cTnT release was biphasic.35 Some reports have claimed that cTnT has higher sensitivity and negative predictive value in detecting MI than conventionally measured cardiac enzymes.36-38 In contrast to cTnI, cTnT is not totally cardiac specific.32 It is expressed in regenerating muscle as well as in normal skeletal muscle33 and its level increases, in the absence of evidence of myocardial involvement, in patients with polymyositis.34 cTnT is also elevated in confirmed myocarditis, pericarditis and heart contusion following blunt heart trauma.27,29 Moreover, spurious rises in cTnT concentration have been reported in patients with diverse underlying clinical condition such as polymyositis, rhabdomyolysis, chronic muscle disease, and renal failure.39-46

Katus et al47 introduced in 1989 a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method using two monoclonal antibodies for the detection of cardiac TnT in serum. In the ‘first-generation’ TnT assay only the capture antibody was completely cardiac-specific. However, the detection antibody was only 78% cardiac-specific.48 This assay had about 1-2% cross-reactivity with skeletal muscle TnT.49 The cross-reactivity was found to be immunologic and resulting from unspecific absorption of purified skeletal TnT to the test tubes.49 The unspecific signal-antibody then detected these molecules. Thus, the ‘first-generation’ test could give false-positive results also in patients with severe skeletal muscle injury. The first assays of ‘premarket generation’ had cut-off values as high as 0.5 µg/l.49 The cut-off values for the actual ‘first-generation’ TnT assays were 0.2 µg/l in the earliest studies and 0.1 µg/l in subsequent studies.50

Troponin I

c TnI is a smaller protein with molecular weight of 22.5 kDa. High troponin concentrations persist for at least 5 days, despite its biological half-life of 120 minutes, reflecting a continuing release of this protein from disintegrating myofilaments.51 Cardiac TnI is present in the circulation in three forms: free, as a TnI-TnC complex, and as TnT-TnI-TnC complex.52 Actually, the predominant part of TnI circulates in the form of a complex.53 Furthermore; these three forms circulate in different degrees of proteolytic degradation.52,54 Katrukha et al showed that in necrotic human cardiac tissues and in serum of MI patients, the amino-and carboxy-terminal regions of cardiac TnI are vulnerable to degradation.54 The most stable region was found to be located between amino acid residues 30 and 110, possibly due to its protection by TnC.54 In another study by Shi et al55 the amino terminal region of cardiac TnI molecule was found to be more stable than the carboxyterminal region. These findings are important in explaining the wide variation of values measured with different TnI assays. Some assays has also been reported to be interfered by rheumatoid factor and heterophilic antibodies, which may lead to false increase of TnI.56-58

Human studies have demonstrated the absence of elevated levels of TnI in a variety of clinical conditions such1,9,48-52 as after endurance exercises, skeletal muscle injury, rhabdomyolysis, chronic myopathy, cocaine induced chest pain, hypothyroidism, non-cardiac surgery, and chronic renal failure.

cTnI was proposed to be a gold standard for diagnosis of acute MI. Table 3 and measurement of cTnI would help clarify the diagnosis in patients with concomitant myocardial and skeletal muscle injury.59,60

 
Comparison of Cardiac Markers in Diagnosis of Acute MI

A small prospective study was performed by Mair61 in order to compare the early sensitivities of myoglobin, CK-MB, Ck-isoform ratios, cTnT and cTnI for acute MI. 37 consecutive patients with acute MI, who were admitted to the CCU within 4 hours after chest pain, were studied. All tested markers had low sensitivity within the 1st 3 hours; and they did not reach 100% sensitivity before 6 to 10 hours after the onset of chest pain. Actually the choice of cardiac marker should be based on the specificity of markers. Subsequently, Pervaiz55 compared cTnI and CK-MB in the diagnosis of AMI in a larger study of 291 patients. They demonstrated that cTnI has higher sensitivity, specificity as well as a wider diagnostic window than CK-MB for diagnosis of acute MI.

Javier de Castro Martinez62 performed a prospective study of 64 patients undergoing CABG. They successfully showed that cTnI had the highest sensitivity of 90.9% and CK-MB had the lowest sensitivity of 72.2% respectively. Hence the authors concluded that cardiac TnI elevation appeared to be an early specific marker for the diagnosis of perioperative MI after CABG.

Kost63 performed a prospective study of 97 patients to compare the use of CK-MB mass, CK-MB isoforms, myoglobin, cTnT and cTnI in the diagnosis of AMI. They successfully showed that cTnI had the highest specificity (100%) and the highest positive predictive value (100%). cTnI, cTnT and CK-MB had the highest sensitivity (90%) and the negative predictive values of cTnI, cTnT and CK-MB were 97.8%, 97.6% and 97.6% respectively. CK-MB isoforms had the lowest sensitivity (70%) and myoglobin had the lowest specificity (75%). The author favoured cTnI due to its high positive predictive value and specificity.

S Ben Ayed64 performed a prospective study of 11 patients, to assess the specificity of biochemical markers, including cTnT and cTnI, during abdominal aortic surgery in a control group of patients without postoperative myocardial infarction. They demonstrated that specificity of myoglobin, CK-MB, cTnI and cTnT was 93%, 92%, 100% and 100% respectively. These authors favoured cTnT and cTnI as highly specific markers for the exclusion of post operative MI in comparison to CK-MB.

Neumayr65 performed a retrospective study of 110 patients admitted to the emergency department for the evaluation of a traumatic chest pain. They demonstrated that cTnI alone had a sensitivity of 90.2%, a specificity of 95.7%, a positive predictive value of 92.5% and a negative predictive value of 94.3%. The combination of CK-Mb and cTnI provided much higher sensitivity (100%) and a much higher negative predictive value (100%), which is particularly important to exclude the diagnosis of acute MI. All these prove that troponins are highly cardiospecific markers.

Troponin T versus I

A few studies have compared troponin T and I directly to each other. Their sensitivities in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction and minor myocardial damage are clinically equal. Troponin I appears to be more specific than T.66 Both give equal prognostic information.68-71 The choice of which marker to be used is institution specific. Emergency physicians should feel confident in the support provided to risk stratification from either assay, and should focus on clinically important turn-around times instead of which test is run.

 
Troponin T and Troponin I : Advantages and Disadvantages

TnI is a biochemical marker of myocardial injury with a high degree of cardiospecificity. The diagnostic specificity of TnT is lower than that of TnI (92%). This is due to the re-expression of TnT during regeneration and degenerative changes in skeletal muscles. Individual genes encode troponins, but at the level of RNA transcription, one particular gene can give rise to a variety of isoforms owing to the mechanism of alternative splicing. In the skeletal muscles, 15 isoforms of TnT, 2 isoforms of cTnI and 2 isoforms of TnC have been detected. In the human myocardium, 2 isoforms of TnT and 1 isoforms of TnI have been isolated. A myocardium form of TnC has not been found.

TnI is absent in the myocardium and skeletal muscles during embryogenesis and foetogenesis. The synthesis of TnI in the myocardium begins postnatally. On the other hand, the synthesis of both isoforms of TnT (TnT1 and TnT2) is induced during the foetal development of both the myocardium and the skeletal muscles. In adult skeletal muscles, TnT is either absent or present only in minute quantities during degeneration and regeneration.

The different methods for assessment of TnI represent the major disadvantages of its clinical use. There are a variety of kits manufactured by different manufacturers. They usually use a system of two antibodies targeted against distinct epitopes. Thus, the tests differ in their analytical sensitivity as well as in detection limits.

In comparison to TnI, the diagnostic parameters of TnT are identical worldwide. It has also been possible to set up a database of clinically verified data.

It is interesting to note that in literature, describing the role, usefulness, and limitations of various biochemical markers, there is considerable variation with regards to reports of their sensitivity and specificity. This may be attributed to varying reference ranges adopted and the consequent categorization of normal and abnormal.

 
Conclusions
Cardiac troponins, especially cTnI, are the test of choice for the diagnosis of AMI given its high sensitivity and superior specificity. In addition multiple applications and testing protocols of cardiac markers have been proposed and applied clinically.
 
Acknowledgement
The authors wish to thank the Dean, Dr. ME Yeolekar, for granting us permission to publish this report.
 
References
1. Fleming PR. Ischaemic heart disease: prelude to an epidemic. In : A short history of cardiology. Amsterdam : Editions Rodopi BV, 1997; 167-79.
2. Hammer A. Ein fall Von thrombotischem Verschlusse einer der Kranzarterien des Herzens. Z Klin Med 1910; 71 : 116-32. Quoted by fleming PR. Ischaemic heart disease: prelude to and epidemic In: a short history of cardiology. Amsterdam: Edition Rodopi BV, 1997; 167-79.
3. Keffer JH. Myocardial markers of injury. Evolution and insights. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 105 : 305-20.
4. Padmavati S. A five-year survey of heart disease in Delhi. Ind Heart J 1958; 10 : 35.
5. hatakia KU. Incidence and etiology of coronary artery disease. J Asso Phys Ind 1964; 14 : 283.
6. Naik BK. Incidence of coronary heart disease and cardiovascular disease in Hyderabad. Ind Heart J 1986; 18 : 357.
7. Adams JE, Jaffe AS. Biochemical markers of myocardial injury. Is MB creatine kinase the choice for the 1990s? Circulation 1993; 88 : 750-63.
8. Lee TH. Ruling out acute myocardial infarction. A prospective multicentre validation of 12-hour strategy for patients at low risk. N Eng J Med 1991; 324 : 1239-46.
9. Mercer DW. A historical background in cardiac markers. Medical Laboratory Observer 1996; 45-51
10. Char DM. Early laboratory indicators of acute myocardial infarction. Emerg Med Clinics North Am 1998; 16 : 519-39.
11. Galvani M, Ferrini D. New markers of early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 1998; 65 : S17-22.
12. Adams JE III, Abendschein DR, Jaffe AS. Biochemical markers of myocardial injury. Is MB creatine kinase the choice for the 1990s? Circulation 1993; 88 : 750-63.
13. Donnelly R, Millar Craig MW. Cardiac troponins: IT upgrade for the heart. Lancet 1998; 351 : 537-39.
14. Apple FS. Cardiac function. In: Burtis Cam ashwood ER eds. Tietz fundamentals of clinical chemistry. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company 2001; 682-97.
15. Char DM, Israel E, Landenson J. Early laboratory indicators of acute myocardial infarction. Emerg Med Clinics North Am 1998; 16 : 519-39.
16. Puleo PR, Meyer D. Use of a rapid assay of subform of creatine kinase MB to diagnose or rule out acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1994; 331 : 561-66.
17. Puleo PR. Noninvasive detection of reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction based on plasma activity of creatine kinase MB isoforms. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17 : 1047-52.
18. Wong SS. Strategic utilization of cardiac markers for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1996; 26 : 310-12.
19. Hossein-Nia M, Mascaro J. Troponin T as a non-invasive marker of cardiac allograft rejection. i 1993; 341 : 838.
20. Lott JA, Heinz JW. Time change of creatine kinase and creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme versus discrimination values in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction; what is the optimal method for displaying the data? Eur J Clin Chem Biochem 1995; 33 : 491-96.
21. Henderson AR, Moss DW. Enzymes. In: Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, eds. Tietz fundamentals of clinical chemistry. 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 2001; 352-89.
22 Woo J, Lacbawan FL, et al. Is Myoglobin useful in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department setting? Am J Clin Pathol 1995; 103 : 725-29.
23. De winter RJ, Koster RW. Value of Myoglobin troponin T and CK-MB mass in ruling out an acute myocardial infarction in the emergency room. Circulation 1995; 92 : 3401-7.
24. Robberts R. Myoglobinemia as an index to myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 1977; 87 : 788-98.
25 Kato K, Mokuno K. Distribution of immunoreactive carbonic anhydrase III in various tissues determined by a sensitive enzyme immunoassay method. Clin Chim Acta 1984; 141 : 169-77.
26. Caulfield JB, Bittner V. Cardiac matrix alternation induced by Adriamycin. Am J Pathol 1988; 133 : 298-305.
27. Vaananen HK. Serum carbonic anhydrase III and Myoglobin concentration in acute MI. Clin Chem 1990; 36 : 635-38.
28. Ishii J, wang JH. Serum concentration of Myoglobin vs human heart type cytoplasmic fatty acid binding protein in early detection of acute MI. Clin Chem 1997; 43 : 1372-78.
29. Fransen EJ, Masessen JG. Demonstration of ischemia-reperfusion injury separate from postoperative infarction in coronary artery bypass graft patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65 : 48-53.
30. Abe S, Saigo M. Heart fatty acid-binding protein is useful in early and myocardial specific diagnosis of acute MI. Circulation 1996; 94 : 321-23.
31. Mair J, Smidt J. Early relese of glycogen phosphorylase in patients with unstable angina and transient ST-T alterations. Br Heart J 1994; 72 : 125-27.
32 Lasala GP, Wright T. Plasma oxidase for screening of myocardial infarction. Am J Med Sci 1994; 308 (3) : 157-61.
33. Katus HA, Scheffold T. Proteins of the troponin complex. Lab Med 1992; 23 : 311-17.
34. Hamm CW, Katus HA. New biochemical markers for myocardial cell injury. Curr Opin Cardiol 1995; 10 : 355-60.
35. Yasul B. The role of the sulfhydryl group of tropomyosin and troponin in the calcium control of actomyosin contractility. J Biol Chem 1968; 25 : 735-42.
36 Katus HA, Neumann FJ. Diagnostic efficiency of troponin T measurement in acute myocardial infarction.Circulation 1991; 83 : 902-12.
37. Antman EM, Sacks DB. Detection of unsuspected myocardial necrosis by rapid besides assay for cardiac troponin T. Am Heart J 1997; 133 : 596-98.
38. Fitzgerald RL, Frankel WL. Comparison of troponin T with cardiac markers in a VA hospital. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 106 ; 396-401.
39. Kobayashi S, Tanaka M. Serum cardiac troponin T in polymyositis/dermatomyositis. Lancet 1992; 726.
40. Mahalingam M. A case against the specificity of cardiac troponin-T. J Clin Pathol 1996; 449 : 766-7.
41. Croitore M. Spurious rises in troponin T in end-stage renal disease. Lancet 1995; 346 : 974.
42. Frankel WL, Herold DA. Cardiac troponin T is elevated in asymptomatic patients with chronic renal failure. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 106 : 118-23.
43. Braun SL, Baum H. Troponin T and troponin I after coronary artery bypass grafting: Discordant results in patients with renal failure. Clin Chem 1996; 42 : 781-83.
44. Lofberg M, Tahtela R. Cardiac troponins in severe rhabdomyolysis. Clin Chem 1996; 42 : 1120-21.
45. Li D, Jialal I. Greater frequency of increased cardiac troponin T then increased cardiac troponin I in patients with chronic renal failure. Clin Chem 1996; 42 : 114-5.
46. Mclaurin MD, Apple FS. Cardiac troponin I, cardiac troponin T and creatine kinase MB in dialysis patients without ischemic heart disease: evidence of cardiac troponin T expression in skeletal muscle. Clin Chem 1997; 43 : 976-82.
47. Katus HA, Remppis A. Enzyme linked immunoassay of cardiac troponin T for detection of acute myocardial infarction in patients. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1989; 21 : 1349-53.
48. Collinson PO, Boa FG. Measurement of cardiac troponin. Ann Clin Biochem 2001; 38 : 423-49.
49. Katus HA, Remppis A. Diagnostic efficiency of troponin T measurement in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1991; 83 : 902-12.
50. Muller-Bardorff M, Hallermayer K, Schroder A. Improved troponin T ELISA specific for cardiac troponin T isoform: assay development and analytical and clinical validation. Clin Chem 1997; 43 : 458-66.
51. Coundrey L. The troponins. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158 : 1173-80.
52. Apple FS. Cardiac function. In: Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, eds, Tiez fundamentals of clinical chemistry. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company 2001; 682-97.
53. Katrukha AG, Bereznikova AV, Esakova TV. Troponin I is released in bloodstream of patients with acute myocardial infarction not in free form but as complex. Clin Chem 1997; 43 : 1349-85.
54. Shi Q, Ling M, Zhang X. Degradation of cardiac troponin I in serum complicates comparisons of cardiac troponin I assays. Clin Chem 1999; 45 : 1018-25.
55. Dasgupta A, Banerjee SK, Datta P. False-positive troponin I in the MEIA due to the presence of rheumatoid factors in serum. Elimination of this interference by using polyclonal antisera against rheumatoid factors. Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 112 : 753-56.
56. Fitzmaurice TF, Brown C, Rifai N, Wu AH, Yeo KT. False increase of cardiac troponin I with heterophilic antibodies. Clin Chem 1998; 44 : 2212-14.
57. Onuska KD, Hill SA. Effect of rheumatoid factor on cardiac troponin I measurement using two commercial measurement systems. Clin Chem 2000; 46 : 307-8.
58. Wu AH, Feng YJ, Moore R. Characterization of cardiac troponin subunit release into serum after acute myocardial infarction and comparison of assays for troponin T and I. Clin Chem 1998; 44 : 1198-1208.
59. Guest TM, Tuteur PG. JAMA 1995; 274 : 1672-73.
60. Keffer JH. The cardiac profile and proposed practice guideline for acute ischemic heart diseases. Am J Clin Pathol 1997; 107 : 398-409.
61. Mair J, Morandell D. Equivalent early sensitivities of myoglobin, creatine kinase MB mass, creatine kinase isoform ratios, and cardiac troponin T and I for acute myocardial infarction. Clin Chem 1995; 41 : 1266-72
62. Javier de castro Martinez. Cardiac Troponin I in perioperative myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass surgery. Rev Esp Cardiol 2002; 55 (3) : 245-50.
63. Kost. Compare the use of CK-MB mass, CK-Mb isoforms, myoglobin, cTnT and cTnI in the diagnosis of MI. Ann Clin Biochem 2001; 55 : 242.
64. yed S Ben, Godet G. Specificity of cardiac markers troponin I and T in excluding postoperative myocardial infarction. Ann Clin Biochem 1997; 34 : 559-60.
65. Neumayr G. Plasma levels of cardiac troponin I after prolonged strenuous endurance exercise. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87 : 369-71, A10.
66. Tucker JF, Collins RA, Anderson AJ, Hauser J, Kalas J, Apple FS. Early diagnostic efficiency of cardiac troponin I and troponin T for acute myocardial infarction. Acad Emerg Med 1997; 4 : 13-21.
67. Hetland O, Dickstein K. Cardiac troponins I and T in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a comparative study in a routine setting. Clin Chem 1998; 44 : 1430-6.
68. Luscher MS, Thygesen K, Ravkilde J, Heickendorff L. Applicability of cardiac troponin T and I for early risk stratification in unstable coronary artery disease. Circulation 1997; 96 : 2578-85.
69. Tanaka H, Abe S, Yamashita T. Serum levels of cardiac troponin I and troponin T in estimating myocardial infarct size soon after reperfusion. Coron Artery Dis 1997; 8 : 433-9
70. Curzen NP, Patel DJ, Kemp M, et al. Can C reactive protein or troponins T and I predict outcome in patients with intractable unstable angina? Heart 1998; 80 : 23-7.
71. Wu AHB. Biochemical markers of cardiac damage: from traditional enzymes to cardiac-specific proteins. Scand J Clin Invest 1999; 59 (Suppl 230) : 74-82.

 

MY LOUSY DOCTOR

My senior attending physician recently told me, "A physician who treats himself, has got a lousy doctor." This he said while being hospitalised just a few days after having a myocardial infarction. Feeling an uncontrolled severe reflux for two days, he had finally recorded an electrocardiogram "just in case". Seeing the inferior wall Q waves and remnant ST segment elevations, he still waited to show the electrocardiogram to a cardiologist, who eventually made him go to the emergency room.

Shortly after, on an unforgettable evening, I suddenly felt the worst abdominal pain I have ever had in my life. I knew, palpating my lower abdomen, that severe tenderness, rebound, and guarding are not good prognostic signs, but I ignored them and hoped everything would disappear by morning.

It didn't I had mild fever the next day, and the pain subsided, but when, on the third day, my temperature rose I had to reconsider my situation. I thought that, although it is quite shameful for an internist (newly certified, mind you) to show up in the emergency department with a case of acute gastroenteritis, perhaps a surgical consultation would be appropriate. After receiving two litres of intravenous normal saline, I persuaded the surgeon that it might truly be a case of acute gastroenteritis. I decided myself to take a short course of antibiotics, and felt better. I even went back to work. I stopped the antibiotics after three days of treatment, because three days are enough.

That evening I felt much worse. The next day, I couldn't drag myself home, and the fever returned. We (that is, my wife) decided to pay another (reluctant) visit to the emergency room. The on-call resident diagnosed colitis. By now, I was running up and down the differential diagnosis, but could conclude nothing. It was 3 am, and luckily the surgeon decided to hospitalise me; so I was now forced to stop diagnosing and treating myself.

After data revision, the "colitis" turned to be acute diverticulitis with a small pericolonic abscess. Yes, this disease is known to occur most commonly in elderly people, and, sure enough, when my good hearted colleagues came to visit they had plenty of jokes at my expense. One warned me of my next hospitalisation due to catheter, related urosepsis, and another asked for my "do not resuscitate" status and transfer to a long term facility. I had to stay in hospital for six days of intravenous antibiotics (and jokes).

These were surely the worst two weeks in my life. Can you imagine the daily "Do nots" from my wife? And being preached to by both my mother and mother in law? Pain and fever paled into insignificance compared with having to listen to my mother, every day, repeating, "A doctor must not take care of himself", and with my mother in law reminding me "You must rest" again and again.

I am now much better and back at work. In a month or so, I will have to experience the wonders of the gastroenterological evaluation, this time not as a doctor. Thus, my mother and mother in law were correct (I can't believe I just wrote that); so was my senior attending physician, although realising it a little late (I wonder if his mother preached to him too): "A physician who treats himself has got a lousy doctor".

Moshe E Gatt, BMJ, 2004; 328 : 219.