| Home
> Table
of Contents > Case
Reports |
| |
| Isolated Caecal Perforation Secondary to
Ileocaecal Tuberculosis |
| |
| Yatindra Kashid |
| |
Although gastrointestinal tuberculosis
is a common clinical entity an isolated case of caecal perforations
has been reported once only in the last 35 years. We report a
case who presented to us with clinical features mimicking acute
appendicitis. At exploration we found multiple perforations in
the caecum for which right colectomy was performed. He was started
on anti-tubercular drugs after histopathological confirmation. |
| |
| Introduction |
Gastrointestinal tuberculosis has made a comeback
with resurgence of pulmonary tuberculosis in the era of HIV infection.1
Clinical presentations vary from adhesions, ascites, peritonitis,
bowel strictures, perforations to cacooned abdomen. Perforations
are commonly located in the distal ileum or in the appendix.2 |
| |
| Case Report |
A 35 year old male patient presented with acute onset
of pain in the right iliac fossa of one day duration associated
with vomiting. He also had history of loose motions for
two days. There was no history of fever. He had two similar
episodes eight months and two years ago, which responded
to conservative treatment and no further investigations
were done. He had pneumonia two years ago.
On examination, patient had tachycardia. Abdominal examination
revealed tenderness in right iliac fossa with guarding
and rebound tenderness. Our clinical diagnosis was acute
exacerbation of chronic appendicitis. X-rays did not reveal
any free gas under diaphragm or air fluid levels in the
abdomen. Ultrasonography showed no evidence of free fluid
in the abdomen. There was marked probe tenderness in right
iliac fossa suggestive of acute appendicitis.
The patient was explored through McBurney’s incision.
During surgery, we found, three acute caecal perforations
5 mm in diameter each on anterior wall on taenea coli
without any oedema of edges, induration or pouting mucosa.
Severe faecal peritonitis was present in right iliac fossa
and pelvis. Small and large intestines and ileocaecal
junction were normal, there was no mesenteric lymphadenopathy
and the appendix was normal. On table we thought of (1)
amoebic typhlitis with perforation, (2) enterocolitis
with perforation and (3) HIV typhlitis with perforation,
as the probable pathology. Right quarter colectomy with
ileostomy and ascending colostomy was performed, in view
of local bowel and peritoneal conditions.
Patient recovered postoperatively. HIV test done after
surgery was non-reactive. Histopathological diagnosis
was ileocaecal tuberculosis with caecal perforations (Fig.
1). Patient was started on suitable complete antituberculous
treatment. Patient is better and was gaining weight at
two months follow-up. |
| |
| Discussion |
With the worldwide resurgence of pulmonary
tuberculosis in recent years, gastrointestinal tuberculosis
has also made a comback. The most common site for gastrointestinal
involvement is the ileocaecal region.1 Commonest pathologies
seen include strictures, adhesions, small intestinal perforations
or mesenteric lymphadenopathies.
Perforations are commonly located in the distal 100 cms
of ileum or in the appendix.2 Isolated caecal perforation
is reported in the literature on one occasion only.3 This
patient had colonic perforation secondary to ileocaecal
tuberculosis. He had a proliferative and ulcerated lesion
in the caecum on colonoscopy. This patient was treated
by right colectomy and antitubercular drugs and remained
asymptomatic at two years follow-up.3
 |
Fig. 1 : Microphotograph showing caecal tuberculosis with transmural inflammation (H and E X 160). |
Caecal perforations in association with colonic pseudo-obstruction
(Ogilvie’s syndrome) are commonly reported. Three
cases of diverticular perforations of caecum and ascending
colon are also reported.4 Isolated caecal perforation
is also reported in severe enterocolitis - particularly
pseudomembranous due to Clostridium difficile. Rarely,
caecal perforation may occur due to fulminant amoebic
colitis.5 Treatment of choice is right hemicolectomy.
In our case, the clinical features mimicked acute perforative
appendicitis leading to incorrect preoperative diagnosis.
X-rays were inconclusive and ultrasonography was misleading.
However, patient made a good recovery postoperatively
and is now awaiting ostomy closure.
|
| |
| References |
| 1. |
Abraham P, Mistry FP. Tuberculosis
of the gastrointestinal tract. Ind J Tub 1992;
39 : 251-56. |
| 2. |
Paustian FF, Marshall JB. Intestinal
tuberculosis. In Berk JE, Haubrich WS, Kalser MH,
Roth JLA, Schaffner F, (Editors). Bockus’ Gastroenterology.
Vol. 3,4th edition, WB Saunders Company, 1985; pp2018-36. |
| 3. |
Bannura G, Valencia C, Fernandez W.
Colonic perforation secondary to ileocaecal tuberculosis.
Report of one case. Rev Med Chil (Spanish)
1999; 127 : 704-8. |
| 4. |
Mauvais F, Benoist S, Panis Y, Chafai
N, Velleur P. Three cases of diverticular perforation
of the caecum and ascending colon. Am Chir
1999; 53 : 89-91. |
| 5. |
Hsu YB, Chen FM, Lee PH, et al. Fulminant
amebiasis : a clinical evaluation. Hepatogastroenterol
1995; 42 : 109-12. |
|
|
|
VIDEO ASSISTED THORACIC SURGERY IS USEFUL BUT UNDERUSED
Video assisted throacic surgery is a minimally invasive approach to diagnosing and treating diseases of the lung and pleura. In a systematic review Sedrakyan and colleagues found that such surgery for pneumothorax and minor resections was associated with shorter length of stay in hospital and less pain with no increase in complications when compared with thoracotomy. However, the same authors found that use of this minimally invasive technology in UK specialist units varies widely and this seems to be explained by surgeons’ preferences rather than patients’ needs.
BMJ, 2004; 329 : 1008, 1011. |
|
|