| Home > Table of Contents > Review Articles |
| |
Ambulatory Surgery for Hydrocoele : A Review of 300 Cases
Parag A Shah*, Bhavik M Patel** |
| |
| In a prospective study, 300 cases of hydrocoele of tunica vaginalis testis were treated by ambulatory surgery. Lords technique was performed under local anaesthesia. A modified simple scrotal dressing was used to facilitate ambulation. In two cases (0.6%), haematoma was reported. There was no wound infection, though in three cases (1%) there was recurrence. Patients tolerated the procedure well and ambulation was excellent in all cases. On the grounds for safety and cost effectiveness, most hydrocoele repair procedures should be performed on an ambulatory basis. |
| |
Introduction
In today’s world, where time is valuable,
all patients demand a speedy recovery from their ailments with minimal pain and discomfort. To keep pace with these and cope up with our patients’ demands while at the same time not compromising on patient care, we started to undertake ambulatory hydrocoele surgery.
Performing surgery on patient’s on an out patient basis is not a new concept. However, the rediscovery, refinement and extension of ambulatory surgery have come about only in the last two decades.
Ambulatory surgery should be performed for well-selected surgical problems, which can be managed on elective basis. The surgical procedure should not last long, with a maximum duration of 1 hour and the surgical technique used should involve minimal dissection, thereby minimizing intra operative haemorrhage and postoperative tissue oedema. These are usually responsible for postoperative pain and discomfort and rendering the patient non-ambulatory and bed ridden.
It has been a routine for hydrocoele surgery to involve bulky scrotal dressings and post operative hospitalization for a minimum period of 72 hours for early detection of post operative scrotal oedema/haematoma.
In order to assess whether hydrocoele surgery could be performed on an ambulatory basis, we undertook a prospective study of 300 cases, performed in outpatient operating theatre with a post operative observation period of 2 hours.1 Lords repair2 was performed under local anaesthesia involving the spermatic cord block. We have found the procedure to be safe, simple, cost effective and highly acceptable to patients. We also used a modified, simple and elastic compression dressing, which was effective in providing support and assisting ambulation.
Material and Methods
Three hundred patients between the ages of 16 and 68 years were selected. The criteria for selection were acceptance of local anaesthesia for the procedure, absence of any concurrent untreated medical illness (especially diabetes mellitus), absence of any local infection, presence of translucent hydrocoele indicating clear fluid within a thin pliable sac and absence of any co-existing pathology of the inguinoscrotal region, such as epididymo-orchitis, hernia or varicocoele.
Laboratory investigations included a complete haemogram to rule out anaemia and eosinophilia (filariasis being the most common cause of hydrocoele in our country). Routine Urine analysis was also performed to exclude urinary tract infection and diabetes. In case of eosinophilia, empirical treatment with diethyl carbamazine citrate for a period of three weeks was given prior to surgery. If urinary tract infection was present it was treated with suitable antibiotics as per urine culture report before surgery.
Surgical Procedure
The patients were asked to fast for 12 hours prior to surgery. Written, valid consent for the procedure was taken and the scrotum shaved. Pre medication with oral atropine 0.6 mg was given. Before taking patients into the operation theare they were asked to evacuate their bladder.
After cleaning and draping, 5 ml of 2% lignocaine was injected into the cord at the root of the scrotum and another 5 ml was injected into the layers of the scrotum at the chosen site if incision after grasping the scrotum and tensing the hydrocoele.
An incision of 5 cm in length was made parallel to the the median raphe. The incision was deepened in layers to the tunica vaginalis parietalis. The sac was opened in the same line of that of the incision. No plane of cleavage was created between the layers of the scrotum and haemostasis at the site of incision was obtained using fine haemostats. On opening the sac, hydrocoele fluid was drained and the testis was delivered. Plicating sutures were taken on the inner aspect of the tunica vaginalis parietalis to draw it up into a cuff around the testis. Five to six sutures were usually required. The wound was irrigated with 1% povidone-iodine and the testis was repositioned back into the scrotum. The wound was closed in two layers, dartos muscle layer with chronic catgut and skin with black silk. No drain was used.
Benzoin tincture was applied over the scrotum and lower abdominal wall over an area 5 cm lateral to the symphysis pubis on either side. A 15 cm length of Elastoplast was divided longitudinally for two thirds of its length. After protecting the incision with a gauze piece, the broad uncut portion of the adhesive plaster was applied to the scrotum ensuring that the cut edge was at the base of the penis. The scrotum was than pulled over the pubic symphysis and the cut portions of the elastoplast were stretched and applied to the lower abdominal wall. Another 15 cm length of elastoplast was divided longitudinally along its entire length and each piece was applied laterally to cover the scrotum and give additional support (Fig. 1). During the application of benzoin tincture as well as the adhesive plaster, care was taken to avoid the inguinal ligament, and the medial aspect of the thigh, to prevent discomfort during ambulation (Fig. 2).
After 2 hours of postoperative observation, the patients were discharged on oral analgesics for three days. One antibiotic was given intramuscularly on prophylactic basis. Patients were asked to report on next day to the out patients department for examination. If no pain or tenderness was reported and the wound devoid of soakage, which was usually the case, it was left undisturbed and patient was advised to return for follow up after seven days for removal of sutures.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
Fig. 1 : Cut elastoplast. |
|
Fig. 2 : Final dressing. |
| |
|
|
|
Results
All patients tolerated the procedure well. The mean duration of surgery was 25 minutes with a maximum of 45 minutes. There were no anaesthesia related complications. No patients complained of pain either intra or post operatively. All patients were subjected to Lords plication except two patients, whose hydrocoele were transillumination positive on pre operative clinical examination but intraoperatively were found to have a thick, calcified and rigid sac. They were treated by sub total excision of the sac and scrotal drainage. They also tolerated the procedure well and were ambulatory in the post-operative phase.
In two cases (0.6%), scrotal haematoma was detected on the first post-operative visit, when they attended for local examination of the wound. They had severe pain and swelling and were admitted. Their scrotum was evacuated and packed. The pack was removed after 24 hours and the wound re-sutured. The patients subsequently made a full recovery. There was no incidence of wound infection in the entire series. No patient complained of any post operative or dressing related discomfort. All were ambulant and led active normal life in post-operative period.
Over a follow-up period ranging from 6 months to 3 years, only three patients i.e. 1% have reported back with recurrence. These three cases belonged to the initial series of 75 cases when absorbable 3 (0) chromic catgut was used for plicating. Subsequently we used non-absorbable 3 (0) mersilk in the rest of the 225 cases since then we have not encountered any recurrence.
Discussion
Before hospitals evolved as important institutions in our society, ambulatory surgery was oldest known form of surgery. In recent decades most surgical procedures have been performed in a hospital setting. According to the American Hospital Association,3 many minor procedures do not require hospitalization. During the 20th century there have been repeated attempts to re-popularize and extend the advantages of ambulatory surgery. This method of providing surgical care is of advantage to patients, surgeons and providers of health care. As far as patient is concerned, as long as there are no increased risks a day care procedure is convenient since there is minimal alteration to his life-style, decreased anxiety, early resumption of work, along with reduced cost. From the surgeons point of view, there is decreased incidence of nosocomial infections as there is less congestion in the wards. His attention can be focused on the critical patients since there is less ward work due to fewer admissions. The hospitals benefit by increased use of facilities and reduction in cost involved.
Safety of the patient does not involve a choice between inpatient and outpatient procedures. Safety is an attitude of mind, and when good practice is followed in selection of patients and techniques by the surgeon, there should be no reason to expect more complications in an out patient setting than with hospitalization.4
Scrotal haematoma is a curse in hydrocoele surgery, the loose tissue of the scrotum giving rise to oedema and haematoma post operatively if haemostasis is not adequate. It is not uncommon to end up with a scrotum larger than its original size. It is for this reason that many surgeons have been reluctant to discharge patients at an early stage after hydrocoele surgery. The average duration of in-hospital stay in the absence of complications has therefore been between 2 and 6 days.5,6
Hospitals must therefore plan and provide out-patient surgical facilities so that appropriate surgeries can be performed on an out-patient basis, enabling patient to be ambulant in the post-operative phase, reducing the cost to the patient, the hospital and the community and assuring optimal use of inpatient beds.
References
1. Hill GJ. Outpatient surgery: Hill GJ ed. Outpatient Surgery, Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1980; 9.
2. Lord PH. A bloodless operation for the radical cure idiopathic hydrocele. Br J Surg 1964; 51 : 914.
3. Hospitals. JAHA 1973: p132.
4. Cohen DD, Dillon JB. Anaesthesia for out patient surgery. JAMA 1964; 196 : 1114.
5. Erfon G, Sharke GG. The Lord Operation for hydrocele. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1967; 125 : 603.
6. Rodriguez WC, Rodriguez DD, Fortuno RF. The operative treatment for hyrocele. A comparison of 4 basic techniques. J Urol 1981; 125 : 804.
|
| |
TOBACCO EXPOSURE IS ASSOCIATED WITH GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE
Active and passive smoking may have a role in the development of glucose intolerance in young adulthood. Houston and colleagues followed over 4600 black and white men and women aged 18-30 with no glucose intolerance at baseline, including current smokers, previous smokers, and “never” smokers with and without exposure to secondhand smoke. After 15 years the incidence of glucose intolerance was highest among smokers (22%), followed by never smokers with passive smoke exposure (17%), and lowest for never smokers without exposure (11%).
BMJ, 2006; 332 : 1064. |
|
| Top |
|