| Home
> Table of Contents
> Original / Research
Articles |
| |
HIV, HBV and HCV Co-Infection Study
Shazia M Ahsan, Preeti R Mehta |
| |
The routes of transmission are common
for HIV, HBV and HCV. There is a paucity of published data on
co-infection by these three viruses. Hence a pilot study was
undertaken to screen 200 HIV positive serum samples from patients
admitted in medical wards of tertiary care charitable hospital
for the presence of HBsAg and antiHCV antibodies. 30 sera from
patients attending out patient clinic and 30 sera from the HCWs
of the hospital who were HIV negative represented the control
group. Of the 200 HIV positive sera tested, 7 were found to
be coinfected with HBV and 16 with HCV. None of the sera showed
the presence of all the three viral markers. On statistical
analysis a significant association was found between raised
liver enzymes and HIV-HCV co-infection. The prevalence of HIV,
HBV and HCV co-infection needs to be studied on a larger scale
for the better understanding of the impact on clinical outcome
and treatment response.
|
| |
| INTRODUCTION |
HIV, HBV, and HCV share common modes of transmission
and risk groups. Concurrent infection with HBV or HCV
in HIV infected individuals leads to interaction between
the viruses altering the natural history and the treatment
response of these diseases. At a molecular level, interactions
between HIV and hepatic viruses may potentiate HIV replication
but clinical studies have been inconclusive.1 There are
very few studies done abroad on the prevalence of HBV
and HCV co-infection in HIV infected patients but there
are no reports from India. Hence, a pilot study was carried
out to determine the prevalence of HBV and HCV co-infection
in HIV infected patients in our population. |
| |
| Material and Methods |
The study was carried out at an 1800 bedded tertiary
care charitable hospital in Mumbai from July 2001 to June
2002. 200 serum samples from patients admitted in medical
ward of our hospital reported as HIV positive were included
in the study group. There were 130 males and 70 females
with a male to female ratio of 2:1 and between the age
group of 1.5-70 years. The patients who tested HIV positive
were traced to the wards and a detailed history regarding
name, age, sex, marital status, if married - duration
of marriage, number of sexual partners, mode of transmission,
investigation done - ALT, AST, Ultrasonography of liver
was taken and recorded in the proforma.
The control group consisted of 2 sub groups of 30 (20
males and 10 females) HIV negative individuals (OPD) patients
without high risk behaviour and 30 (20 males and 10 females)
healthy HIV negative health care workers. After obtaining
written consent, 5 ml of blood was collected in a plain
test tube from each of them using aseptic precautions.
The blood was allowed to clot at room temperature for
30 minutes. After clotting the serum was transferred to
another tube for centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes.
The clear serum was withdrawn with the help of Pasteur
pipette and transferred to a sterile plastic vial for
storage. All the 260 serum samples were stored at 20oC.
All the 260 sera were tested for HBsAg using Hepanostika
kit (Organon Teknika), and were also tested for presence
of anti-HCV antibodies using LG HCD 3.0 (LG Chemical Ltd.).
Manufacturer’s instructions were followed for both
the assays.
Data was statistically analyzed on computer using SPSS/PC
+ (V 6) statistical package. P=0.05 was taken as the significance
level. 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was calculated to
find the limits of prevalence. Chi Square Test, Fishers
Exact Test (one tailed) and student’s t Test were
applied to the data wherever appropriate. |
| |
| Results |
In the study group, out of the 200 HIV positive sera
tested, 7 (3.5%) were HBsAg positive and 16 (8%) were
anti HCV positive. No serum was found to contain all the
viral markers. In the control groups none of the sera
tested positive for HBsAg or anti-HCV.
In our study, the routes of transmission for the three
virus infections were found to be as shown in Table 1.
 |
174 patients (87%) were married and 26 (13%) were unmarried. 18/26 unmarried patients had history of sexual contact with commercial sex workers. In married patients, the average length of sexual relationship was 12 years. Married patients had an average of 2 sexual partners whereas unmarried patients had 3.
19/200 had abnormal SGOT and SGPT, 7/200 showed abnormalities on liver sonography. All 7 HBsAg positive patients were having normal SGOT and SGPT and liver sonography. Of the 16 patients co-infected with HCV, nearly half had abnormal liver biochemistry. However, all showed normal findings on liver sonography. |
|
| |
| Discussion |
In patients infected with HIV and HBV, chronic HBV
carriage is more common and HBV DNA levels are increased
although hepatic neuroinflammation is reduced. Infection
with HIV and HCV results in higher viral load of HCV and
greater liver cell damage.1
There are a couple of published reports from India on
HIV and HBV co-infection but none on HCV co-infection.
However, studies on HIV, HBV and HCV have been reported
from abroad as shown in Table 2.
 |
While comparing the prevalence of HIV, HBV and HCV co-infection though the routes of transmission for all are the same, the prevalence of co-infection varies from place to place. The prevalence of HIV and HBV co-infection in our study was 3.5%, which is similar to that reported by Treitinger et al6 however, it is significantly lower (p value < 0.05) than that reported by other Indian as well as foreign studies.2-5,7 This may be due to the differences in the study group and prevalence of HBsAg in the community in that geographical area. Dimitrakopoulos et al7 have reported a very high prevalence of 67.4% of HIV and HBV co-infection. This could be probably because they tested for HBV infection not only by detecting HBsAg but also other markers of HBV infection. The prevalence of HIV and HCV co-infection of 8% in our study is similar to the study done by Dimitrakopoulos et al7 (p value > 0.05).
However, Saillour F et al4 have reported 42.5% prevalence, which is high. They studied the prevalence in two groups namely blood donors and heterosexuals. The prevalence in heterosexual group is 7.3% which is comparable to our study. J Ockenga et al5 have reported 23% prevalence which may be because along with anti-HCV antibodies they also used HCV RNA detection for HCV infection. |
In the present study, the prevalence of HIV-HCV co-infection
was more as compared to HIV-HBV co-infection (6.38% vs
3.72%). The possible hypothesis for this could be that
studies have indicated in HIV positive individuals co-infection
with hepatitis C can suppress hepatitis B and hepatitis
C remains the dominant illness. Thus in HCV dominant disease
the anti-HCV is detectable while the HBV is not.8
In our study the finding of abnormal liver biochemistry
in HIV-HCV coinfected patients correlates with the study
done by Quaranta et al.9
To summarize the present study, HIV - HCV co-infection
was found in 4/11 blood transfusion recipients and 12/188
heterosexuals whereas HIV-HBV co-infection was found only
in heterosexuals (7/188). However, this finding was not
significant as the number of blood transfusion was very
small (11/200), the majority being heterosexuals (188/200).
On statistical analysis, a significant association was
found between raised liver enzymes and HIV - HCV co-infection.
However association between HIV - HBV co-infection or
HIV - HCV co-infection and duration of marriage, number
of sexual partners, and liver sonography was not found
to be statistically significant.
To conclude, HIV positive individuals with elevated liver
enzymes should be screened for HCV. Though reported to
be infrequent, our finding of sexual transmission of HCV
in HIV infected individuals warrants testing of partners
of HIV-HCV co-infected patients for HCV.
Co-infection with HBV and HCV is more in HIV positive
individuals as compared to HIV negative individuals. Therefore,
all HIV positive individuals and their sexual partners
should be screened for HCV. |
| |
References
| 1. |
Brendon McCarran, Thyagarajan SP. HIV
and hepatotropic viruses : Interactions and treatments.
Indian J Med Microbiol 1998; 16 (1) : 4-11. |
| 2. |
Dhanvijay AG, Thakar YS, Chande CA.
Hepatitis B virus infection in HIV infected patients.
Indian J Med Microbiol 1999; 17 (4) : 167-69. |
| 3. |
Ramanamma MV, Ramani TV. Incidence
of hepatitis B infection in Visakhapatnam. Indian
J Med Microbiol 2000; 18 (4) : 170-71. |
| 4. |
Saillour F, Dabis F, Dupon M, et al.
Prevalence and determinants of antibodies to hepatitis
C virus and markers for hepatitis B virus infection
in patients with HIV infection in Aquitaine. BMJ 1996;
313 : 461-64. |
| 5. |
Ockenga J, Tillmann HL, Trautweing
C, et al. Hepatitis B and C in HIV infected patients,
prevalence and prognostic value. J Hepatol 1997; 27
(1) : 18-24. |
| 6. |
Dimitrakopolous A, Takou
A, Haida A, et al. The pervalence of hepatitis B and
C in HIV positive Greek patients, relationship to
survival decreased AIDS patients. J Infect Dis 2000;
40 (2) : 127-31. |
| 7. |
Treitinger A, Spada C,
Ferreira LA, et al. Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C prevalence
among blood donors and HIV - 1 infected patients in
Florianopolis - Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis 2000; 4(4)
: 192-96. |
| 8. |
Sheen IS, Liaw YE, Chu
CM, et al. Role of hepatitis C virus infection in
spontaneous hepatitis B surface antigen clearance
during chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Infect
Dis 1992; 165 (5) : 831-34. |
| 9. |
Quaranta JF, Delaney SR,
Alleman S, et al. Prevalence of antibody to hepatitis
C virus in HIV infected patients. J Med Virol 2994;
49 : 29-32. |
|
| |
|
|