Hiccups occur in normal population, especially
when one eats spicy foods or drinks less fluids. Often you cannot
pinpoint the cause. The phenomenon of hiccup occurs because
of involuntary contraction of one or both domes of the diaphragm
(usually both).
The trouble is pronounced, when the symptom becomes a nuisance.
This happens especially when the hiccups continue for a longer
duration. The public is under the impression that hiccups occur
in patients having a serious underlying disease. So the patient
must visit a doctor.
In my practice, I have seen hundreds of such patients. These
patients include an Indian surgeon from America, who landed
with severe intractable hiccups of ten days’ duration.
Ten days prior to that, while in USA, he was sent to many specialists
(including a gastroenterologist and neurologist) and had also
undergone every possible blood test and imaging procedure. After
landing in Mumbai, treatment with chlorpromazine aborted the
attack.
During my lecture series on 2-3 occasions, I have brought on
the stage patients having ‘status hiccupus’. Not
only that, on four occasions I have also been lucky to see unilateral
hiccups involving only one diaphragm. This phenomenon has been
described in literature.
Two things have helped me to know this illness better and to
treat it more effectively. The first is that I have been doing
dark room fluoroscopy for over 40 years. Thus, in patients coming
with continuous persistent hiccups, I have seen the diaphragmatic
contractions on fluoroscopy and have been able to explain to
the relatives that this is a movement disorder of the group
of muscles, which form a partition between the chest and abdomen.
Also, with the help of dark room fluoroscopy, I have been able
to corroborate that ‘Status Hiccupus’,
is nothing but a diaphragmatic flutter which produces a continuous
hiccup, thus causing near choking of breath, panic symptoms
and a fear of death in the patient. The movements of the diaphragm
seen on fluoroscopy during an episode of ‘status
hiccupus’, are better than any dance performance
seen on the stage.
Secondly, during my tenure as Honorary Physician at JJ Group
of Hospitals, I was lucky to have a tetanus ward attached to
our unit. In earlier days, we used IV chlorpromazine in very
large doses-500 to 1000 milligrams, over 24 hours to control
the spasms of tetanus patients. So, I am very confident of the
drug, which other doctors are afraid to use in private practice.
Administering a dose of 50-100 mg intramuscularly or intravenously
should call for no inhibitions. Similarly this drug can be given
orally for a few days or weeks to patients having continuous
hiccups. Remember that alcohol rehabilitation centres
are using the same drug orally for a period of 6 months to 1
year to prevent relapses. The hepatotoxicity
of this drug is not more than that of amiodarone, which is freely
used, in cardiology practice.
Now coming to the most important part of the article i.e. the
word ‘hiccup’ should be given a proper terminology,
when it presents as a disease. Neurologists use the term ‘movement
disorder’ when skeletal muscles of the body produce involuntary
contractions. Gastroenterologists use the word ‘motility
disorder’ when organs like oesophagus and colon are involved.
Diaphragm is a partly skeletal and partly non-skeletal muscle.
Why should we not term this illness as ‘motility or movement
disorder’ of diaphragm? Like other motility and movement
disorders, when drugs fail to control hiccups (after the initial
simple instructions of drinking frequent sips of water, radish
juice, cream, honey, etc), interventional treatment is sometimes
required. This involves injecting Novocaine in phrenic nerve
in the neck, which is equivalent to an injection of botulin
toxin in neurological disorders. Similarly, as surgery is offered
to patients of movement disorders, when they do not respond
to drugs or interventional treatment, rarely surgery in the
form of crushing of the phrenic nerve can be advised to patients
having resistant hiccups.
|
SELF-MANAGING
CHRONIC ILLNESS
‘‘Identifying who benefits most from
which self-management intervention is an important addition
to any assessment’
Self-management of chronic illnesses is becoming an
important issue because of the ageing population. In
a Seminar, Stanton Newman and colleagues examine the
background, content, and efficacy of self-management
interventions for type 2 diabetes, arthritis, and asthma.
The different objectives of the interventions and the
complexity of the issues being tackled must be taken
into account. For example, interventions for diabetes
and asthma are targeted at control of the condition,
but for arthritis, strategies to deal with pain and
disability are needed. In a Comment paper, JA Muir Gray
states that patients are not all alike, and that self-management
will not necessarily be equally effective for all.
Lancet,
2005; 1467, 1523.
CRASH LANDING FOR CORTICOSTEROIDS
‘There is no reduction in mortality with
methylprednisolone in the 2 weeks after head injury'
Every year, millions of people around the world are
treated for head injury - a major cause of death and
disability in children and young adults. For more than
30 years, corticosteroids such as methylprednisolone
have been used to treat such injuries. However, systematic
reviews have questioned the use of these drugs. The
CRASH trial collaborators did a randomised trial in
more than 10,000 adults with head injury to find out
if the death rate fell with corticosteroids within 2
weeks of injury. In fact, they noted an increase in
the risk of death in patients taking methylprednisolone
and the trial was stopped early. In a Comment paper,
Stefan Sauerland and Marc Maegele say these findings
are alarming and calculate that about 10000 patients
with brain injury could have lost their life by taking
these drugs.
Lancet, 2004; 1291, 1321.
|
|